X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com
Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 10:46:14 -0500
Message-ID: <redirect-2752850@logan.com>
X-Original-Return-Path: <randylsnarr@yahoo.com>
Received: from web54408.mail.yahoo.com ([206.190.49.138] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.0)
  with SMTP id 2752331 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 22 Feb 2008 02:01:46 -0500
Received: (qmail 21764 invoked by uid 60001); 22 Feb 2008 07:01:46 -0000
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;
  h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID;
  b=gzUC4xpt31zcCiEM2yoY3XP/H6oUPubzghqbyzNomQ2OHvgnvsH0HZAETVthqShrcP7wUsKkgaR1LNT8T7vlOTRnPFuyGlcmp+LvfxUaYggjuoa0SqzsSG+Ve5vSV6qzS+n/J3a2PDt1tV+H6aAGfhwinegjiK2FwXEUjGDORMc=;
X-YMail-OSG: dsra5CwVM1lmh3HQyLneHLfvKyInzFIhw1.nzwPEUF9f2rxOBlxO1HAuDaw.wcpnh_sK.9nJJCLWAwfZ.AnM32sTCC4GWErzZFIExJUpuZbGseRepQ--
Received: from [76.8.220.18] by web54408.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 21 Feb 2008 23:01:46 PST
X-Original-Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 23:01:46 -0800 (PST)
From: randy snarr <randylsnarr@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Additional Tail Strength
X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List <lml@lancaironline.net>
In-Reply-To: <list-2751404@logan.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-963647554-1203663706=:19230"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Original-Message-ID: <567045.19230.qm@web54408.mail.yahoo.com>

--0-963647554-1203663706=:19230
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

FWIW,
I have gone to 245 mph indicated on a few occasions. Just below the red line in my 235/320. I have the large tail with no extra anything except what the factory had me do. 
I have no intention to do it again but I have no issue to going and  routinely see 200-215 mph indicated decending from high altitude. Airplane seems absolutely at home at those speeds.

Randy L Snarr
235/320 
N694RS

Sky2high@aol.com wrote:     Doug,
  
 If you are going to fly the airplane within the design envelope, it  probably isn't necessary.  I haven't heard of any tails being twisted  off.  I understand that there may be additional concern from folks with the  MKII tail as the larger surface could impute greater stress.  It is  not easy to work back there once the tail is closed out.  Perhaps others  will chime in.
  
 Scott
  
  In a message dated 2/20/2008 2:21:26 P.M. Central Standard Time,  dbaleshta@tru.ca writes:
 I just    finished closing the Vertical Stab.  Do you think it would be worthwhile    to get back in there and try to complete the oval just before the    spar/bulkhead ahead of the horizon Stab (not sure I can squirm in    there)?  Would additional bid on the strake, to the baggage bulkhead help    instead?




---------------------------------
Delicious ideas to please the pickiest eaters. Watch the video on AOL Living.


       
---------------------------------
Never miss a thing.   Make Yahoo your homepage.
--0-963647554-1203663706=:19230
Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

FWIW,<br>I have gone to 245 mph indicated on a few occasions. Just below the red line in my 235/320. I have the large tail with no extra anything except what the factory had me do. <br>I have no intention to do it again but I have no issue to going and&nbsp; routinely see 200-215 mph indicated decending from high altitude. Airplane seems absolutely at home at those speeds.<br><br>Randy L Snarr<br>235/320 <br>N694RS<br><br><b><i>Sky2high@aol.com</i></b> wrote:<blockquote class="replbq" style="border-left: 2px solid rgb(16, 16, 255); margin-left: 5px; padding-left: 5px;">   <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=US-ASCII"> <meta content="MSHTML 6.00.6000.16608" name="GENERATOR"><font id="role_document" color="#000000" face="Arial" size="2"> <div>Doug,</div> <div>&nbsp;</div> <div>If you are going to&nbsp;fly the airplane within the design envelope, it  probably isn't necessary.&nbsp; I haven't heard of any tails being twisted  off.&nbsp; I understand that
 there may be additional concern from folks with the  MKII tail as the larger surface could impute&nbsp;greater stress.&nbsp; It is  not easy to work back there once the tail is closed out.&nbsp; Perhaps others  will chime in.</div> <div>&nbsp;</div> <div>Scott</div> <div>&nbsp;</div> <div> <div>In a message dated 2/20/2008 2:21:26 P.M. Central Standard Time,  dbaleshta@tru.ca writes:</div> <blockquote style="border-left: 2px solid blue; padding-left: 5px; margin-left: 5px;"><font style="background-color: transparent;" color="#000000" face="Arial" size="2">I just    finished closing the Vertical Stab.&nbsp; Do you think it would be worthwhile    to get back in there and try to complete the oval just before the    spar/bulkhead ahead of the horizon Stab (not sure I can squirm in    there)?&nbsp; Would additional bid on the strake, to the baggage bulkhead help    instead?</font></blockquote></div></font><br><br><br><div><font style="color: black; font-family: ARIAL,SAN-SERIF;
 font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 10pt; line-height: normal; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal;"><hr style="margin-top: 10px;">Delicious ideas to please the pickiest eaters. <a title="http://living.aol.com/video/how-to-please-your-picky-eater/rachel-campos-duffy/2050827?NCID=aolcmp00300000002598" href="http://living.aol.com/video/how-to-please-your-picky-eater/rachel-campos-duffy/2050827?NCID=aolcmp00300000002598" target="_blank">Watch the video on AOL Living.</a></font></div></blockquote><br><p>&#32;



      <hr size=1>Never miss a thing.  <a href="http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=51438/*http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs"> Make Yahoo your homepage.</a>


--0-963647554-1203663706=:19230--