Lynn,
Perhaps the other racers should consider a modification. As it was
explained to me, the oval strong shape of the tail cone is not continuous once
the vertical strake starts to rise up from it. That is, the structure is
not continuously round back to the major structural bulkhead that fills the tail
cone and extends upward into the forward part of the vertical stabilizer while
connected to the carry through of the leading edge of the horizontal stab.
Try to visualize the resistant strength of a tube when one tries to twist
it. Now visualize if it were is constructed like the tail in the area of
the strake - the tube is discontinuous there. Such weakness can
allow the tail to more easily twist between the start of the strake and the
bulkhead. This form of construction is at least true for 200/300 and
Legacy series aircraft.
One way to address this potential problem for 300 series aircraft is to
complete the oval tail cone from the strake back to the bulkhead by floxing a
fitted foam filler into the strake and then applying ample BIDs of glass (or
carbon) across the filler and connecting the sides of the top of the tail
cone. Remember also that the vertical is bonded to the tail in a way
such that this area is not strengthened by foam separating the inner and
outer skins to begin with (monocoque concept). I have seen cracks in the
clear cost on the strake at its leading edge seam (no joggle
there). Others have seen horizontal cracks in the vertical part of
the strake on their 360. Of course, these Lancairs have been stressed -
perhaps more than the average.
I am sure that the external application of carbon BID provides more
strength. If I were building today, I would fill the strake by
floxing in proper strong foam while only half the vertical was constructed
and bond the other half when the vertical was closed out.
Again, this is probably not worth considering for most Lancairs extant and
flown within the design envelope. One should consider examining the strake
area carefully during each annual condition inspection.
Scott Krueger
AKA Grayhawk
Lancair N92EX IO320 SB 89/96
Aurora, IL (KARR)
Pilot
not TSO'd, Certificated score only > 70%.
In a message dated 2/18/2008 1:46:59 P.M. Central Standard Time,
farnsworth@charter.net writes:
"Remember that if you bought a carbon
Legacy kit and intended to race it
at Reno, Lancair
applied extra
carbon in the tail cone and vertical stablizer area for
strength
and
stiffness."
The above statement in
interesting. My Super Legacy was the first to have
the area from the
windows to 3/4 the way up the vertical stabilizer
reinforced with 4 layers
of additional carbon fiber. Darryl Greeamyer's
Legacy was the second.
My understanding is that, for an additional cost, a person can now
order
this reinforcement incorporated in the kit when it is produced in
the
Philippines.
I thought that with the higher speeds that were
being flown at Reno that it
might be prudent to strengthen that area of the
fuselage. I expressed my
concern to Andy Chiavetta. He, in turn, ask Greg
Cole and Greg was greatly
if favor of the idea. Darryl, at first, resisted
the idea, then decided to
do it too.
My highest indicated air speed,
to date, is 340 knots. Greg says we are good
to .6 mach.
I don't
think that any of the standard Legacys that race at Reno have
this
modification.