X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 18:17:25 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: <5zq@cox.net> Received: from eastrmmtao102.cox.net ([68.230.240.8] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2c4) with ESMTP id 2694314 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 08:53:16 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=68.230.240.8; envelope-from=5zq@cox.net Received: from eastrmimpo03.cox.net ([68.1.16.126]) by eastrmmtao102.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.08.02.01 201-2186-121-102-20070209) with ESMTP id <20080126135236.WLED26354.eastrmmtao102.cox.net@eastrmimpo03.cox.net> for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 08:52:36 -0500 Received: from bh1 ([72.209.225.157]) by eastrmimpo03.cox.net with bizsmtp id hpbi1Y0083QP3uo0000000; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 08:35:42 -0500 X-Original-Message-ID: <003501c86022$bedc91e0$6501a8c0@bh1> From: "Bill & Sue" <5zq@cox.net> X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" References: Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Interference ? X-Original-Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 08:52:52 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198 Yeah, I know that all of the stuff on both of our Lancairs went together perfectly simply by following the clear, concise instructions in the manual. What could be easier? Bill Harrelson (with tongue hysoled in cheek) N5ZQ 320 1,450 hrs N6ZQ IV under construction > Rob, what interference issues? You must know by now that if you follow > the instruction manual to the letter, everything fits perfectly! > > :-) > > Angier > N4ZQ > N3ZQ > > -- > For archives and unsub > http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html >