X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 17:34:57 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: <5zq@cox.net> Received: from eastrmmtao105.cox.net ([68.230.240.47] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2c4) with ESMTP id 2691513 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 09:25:55 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=68.230.240.47; envelope-from=5zq@cox.net Received: from eastrmimpo03.cox.net ([68.1.16.126]) by eastrmmtao105.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.08.02.01 201-2186-121-102-20070209) with ESMTP id <20080124142516.QOOM4251.eastrmmtao105.cox.net@eastrmimpo03.cox.net> for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 09:25:16 -0500 Received: from bh1 ([72.209.225.157]) by eastrmimpo03.cox.net with bizsmtp id h28o1Y00B3QP3uo0000000; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 09:08:49 -0500 X-Original-Message-ID: <001201c85e95$04773b40$6501a8c0@bh1> From: "Bill & Sue" <5zq@cox.net> X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" References: Subject: Re: [LML] Wing Gap L320 X-Original-Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 09:25:49 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_000F_01C85E6B.1B5C13F0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_000F_01C85E6B.1B5C13F0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello Jim, I think that 1/8 would work out fine, as would 1/4 or 3/8. There is = flexing at this spot, but not a great deal. What I found works out well = is to fill the gap with silicon caulk. I tried tape but that always = seemed to come off. Bill Harrelson N5ZQ 320 1,450 hrs N6ZQ IV under construction Well nobody responded. So my guess is 1/8"? This too close? Comments? Jim ------=_NextPart_000_000F_01C85E6B.1B5C13F0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hello Jim,

I think that 1/8 would work out fine, = as would 1/4=20 or 3/8. There is flexing at this spot, but not a great deal. What I = found works=20 out well is to fill the gap with silicon caulk. I tried tape but that = always=20 seemed to come off.

Bill Harrelson

N5ZQ 320 1,450 hrs

N6ZQ IV under = construction

Well nobody = responded.=20 So my guess is 1/8=94? This too close?=20 Comments?
Jim

------=_NextPart_000_000F_01C85E6B.1B5C13F0--