Mailing List lml@lancaironline.net Message #4588
From: Marvin Kaye <marvkaye@olsusa.com>
Subject: Re: RELIABILITY
Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2000 04:08:24 -0500
To: <lancair.list@olsusa.com>
         <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
          <<  Lancair Builders' Mail List  >>
          <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>
Posted for Rob Wolf <RWolf99@aol.com>:

In a message dated 2/5/0 9:45:47 PM, you wrote:

<<The idea is to stress the engine as hard as possible to detect any
developing weakness>>

Do you do your run-ups at full RPM also?  Seems to me that's in keeping with
your philosophy.  And if you think you're operating the engine in a manner to
cause it to fail, I have to ask why you're doing it?  Wouldn't you rather
take off at a lower setting and push it up to 100% at 1000 feet altitude?

Didn't think so.

Parts with a fatigue life are designed by derating the allowable material
stress to account for the cyclic loading on the part.  For an engine that's
easy.  2500 RPM times 2000 hours tells you how many loading cycles will be on
every part.  I don't think that running the engine at an economy setting will
prolong the life of pistons, connecting rods, and the like due to a reduced
number of stress cycles.  I think that a much stronger factor is excessive
temperatures at higher power settings, and you protect against that by having
your cooling system up to snuff.

These things are designed to run at full power for takeoff and climb.  Don't
be afraid to use it.  Of course, you could install an O-360 and run it at
lower power settings, pretending it's only an O-320...

- Rob Wolf


>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
LML website:   http://www.olsusa.com/Users/Mkaye/maillist.html
Builders' Bookstore:   http://www.buildersbooks.com/lancair

Please send your photos and drawings to marvkaye@olsusa.com.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster