X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 00:19:21 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from [64.12.136.171] (HELO imo-m12.mail.aol.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2c1) with ESMTP id 2573735 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 09 Dec 2007 17:51:46 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.12.136.171; envelope-from=Sky2high@aol.com Received: from Sky2high@aol.com by imo-m12.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38_r9.3.) id q.d3b.18c124d2 (39332) for ; Sun, 9 Dec 2007 17:51:00 -0500 (EST) From: Sky2high@aol.com X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2007 17:51:00 EST Subject: Re: [LML] Re: GAMI Injectors? X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-----------------------------1197240660" X-Mailer: AOL 9.0 VR sub 5006 X-Spam-Flag: NO -------------------------------1197240660 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 12/9/2007 3:47:35 P.M. Central Standard Time, colyncase@earthlink.net writes: I know this is a dumb question but I want to be smarter: if the injection system is constant flow, why did you equalize the lengths of tubing from the spider to the cylinders? Colyn, There are no dumb questions. ----------- There can be dumb answers and this may be one. Why, oh why have you asked why? Who, oh who influenced me to do that? That is the question. A fellow racer (who shall remain un-named for privacy reasons) was convinced his engine ran better with equal length injector lines. He "suggested" that I might find the same result because of equalizing the effect of fluid drag in the longer lines. I have not found any results that would indicate any difference and, at the next annual (assuming I am not too lazy), I may just switch back to the two shorter ones for cyls 1 & 3. This will save at least .72 oz, thus allowing me to go faster. Notice that you are not any smarter after that "excuse." Grayhawk Easily influenced by promises of more speed. **************************************Check out AOL's list of 2007's hottest products. (http://money.aol.com/special/hot-products-2007?NCID=aoltop00030000000001) -------------------------------1197240660 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
In a message dated 12/9/2007 3:47:35 P.M. Central Standard Time,=20 colyncase@earthlink.net writes:
<= FONT=20 style=3D"BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" face=3DArial color=3D#000000 size= =3D2>I know=20 this is a dumb question but I want to be smarter:  if the inject= ion=20 system is constant flow, why did you equalize the lengths of tubing from t= he=20 spider to the cylinders?
Colyn,
 
There are no dumb questions. ----------- There can be dumb answers and=20= this=20 may be one.
 
Why, oh why have you asked why?  Who, oh who influenced me to do t= hat?=20 That is the question.  A fellow racer (who shall remain un-named for=20 privacy reasons) was convinced his engine ran better with equal length=20 injector lines.  He "suggested" that I might find the same result becau= se=20 of equalizing the effect of fluid drag in the longer lines.  I hav= e=20 not found any results that would indicate any difference and, at the ne= xt=20 annual (assuming I am not too lazy), I may just switch back to the two short= er=20 ones for cyls 1 & 3.  This will save at least .72 oz, thus allowing= me=20 to go faster.
 
Notice that you are not any smarter after that "excuse."
 
Grayhawk
Easily influenced by promises of more speed.



Check out AOL Money & Finance's list of the hottest products and top money wasters of 2007.<= /FONT> -------------------------------1197240660--