Return-Path: <lancair.list-request@olsusa.com>
Received: from portal.udlp.com ([207.109.1.80]) by truman.olsusa.com
          (Post.Office MTA v3.1.2 release (PO203-101c)
          ID# 0-44819U2500L250S0) with ESMTP id AAA22983
          for <Lancair.list@olsusa.com>; Wed, 2 Sep 1998 21:11:57 -0400
Received: from portal.udlp.com (root@localhost)
	by portal.udlp.com with ESMTP id UAA21646
	for <Lancair.list@olsusa.com>; Wed, 2 Sep 1998 20:11:46 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from ccmail.udlp.com ([128.254.66.12])
	by portal.udlp.com with SMTP id UAA21613
	for <Lancair.list@olsusa.com>; Wed, 2 Sep 1998 20:11:45 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from ccMail by ccmail.udlp.com
  (IMA Internet Exchange 3.01 Enterprise) id 000F193A; Wed, 2 Sep 98 20:13:22 -0500
From: CHRISTOPHER_ZAVATSON@udlp.com
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 1998 18:07:42 -0500
Message-ID: <000F193A.CE21254@udlp.com>
Subject: brakes
To: Lancair.list@olsusa.com
X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com
Mime-Version: 1.0

          <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
          <<  Lancair Builders' Mail List  >>
          <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>
     
     
     Scott,
     
     Could you be more specific regarding the 'problems cited'.  While 
     older Matco brakes may have had their problems, the current parts 
     appear to be just fine. (I am not including the brake lines here).  I 
     have 160 hours on my Matco brakes (delivered 12-95, dual installation) 
     and haven't had any problems.  In addition, the brake pads are showing 
     minimal wear.
     
     Chris
     L360
     N91CZ