X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2007 15:11:16 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from elasmtp-dupuy.atl.sa.earthlink.net ([209.86.89.62] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2c1) with ESMTP id 2460074 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 07 Nov 2007 11:13:19 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.86.89.62; envelope-from=panelmaker@earthlink.net DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net; b=AJDpUjfJywYtHTpIYH7R7X13IkDwyyYu0hkGvAgdvqYVLifuoaLhoJL9t2UgKWiM; h=Received:From:To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:Thread-Index:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP; Received: from [76.30.49.213] (helo=DELL8300) by elasmtp-dupuy.atl.sa.earthlink.net with asmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1IpnWD-0006SI-JA for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 07 Nov 2007 11:12:42 -0500 From: "Jim Nordin" X-Original-To: "'Lancair Mailing List'" Subject: Flaps/faired position X-Original-Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2007 10:14:37 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0056_01C82127.00B9D900" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198 Thread-Index: AcghTRPkPjgL6KOIRdaeIs7Y+pnD7gACSneQ In-Reply-To: X-Original-Message-ID: X-ELNK-Trace: bdfc62829fd2a80cc8ad50643b1069f8239a348a220c26092004dbdc1dc0c2ff8e49d812038b31af667c3043c0873f7e350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 76.30.49.213 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0056_01C82127.00B9D900 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit A caveat to this story. Which side are you using to call "preset at the reflex position"? One or both may be incorrect in reflex. The fuselage fairing positions before "adjustment" are a bit rough. By that I mean the fairings are not at an equal level condition (WL) with respect to each other from the factory . at least mine weren't. You must make them equal in waterline position by "adjusting" the fairings during construction (heatgun and urging). Otherwise, one WILL be at a higher (or lower) WL than the other. One of mine was >1/4" higher than the other. I adjusted one of them and don't know if the reflex is correct or not. So we'll either suffer the indignity of having flaps that do not match with the fairings, your reflex will not be perfect, you'll fly with offset (un-faired) aileron to fly with out roll, or you'll split the flaps and your ailerons will look funny. Or a combination of some of these. Jim . 360 _____ From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Sky2high@aol.com Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2007 8:47 AM To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: [LML] Re: Flaps/faired position In a message dated 11/6/2007 8:19:05 P.M. Central Standard Time, sbej@verizon.net writes: Did I read correctly when someone said that the fairings molded into the 360 fuselage are preset at the reflex position? So basically when the flaps are fair with these molded fairing at the fuselage then they are reflexed up the proper amount? I have a 1998 kit. Bryan, Yes. Scott Krueger AKA Grayhawk Lancair N92EX IO320 SB 89/96 Aurora, IL (KARR) _____ See what's new at AOL.com and Make AOL Your Homepage. ------=_NextPart_000_0056_01C82127.00B9D900 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

A caveat to this = story.

Which side are you using to call = “preset at the reflex position”? One or both may be incorrect in = reflex.

The fuselage fairing positions = before “adjustment” are a bit rough. By that I mean the fairings are not at an equal level = condition (WL) with respect to each other from the factory … at least mine = weren’t. You must make them equal in waterline position by = “adjusting” the fairings during construction (heatgun and urging). Otherwise, one WILL = be at a higher (or lower) WL than the other. One of mine was >1/4” = higher than the other. I adjusted one of them and don’t know if the reflex is = correct or not. So we’ll either suffer the indignity of having flaps that = do not match with the fairings, your reflex will not be perfect, you’ll = fly with offset (un-faired) aileron to fly with out roll, or you’ll split = the flaps and your ailerons will look funny. Or a combination of some of = these.

Jim … 360

From: = Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Sky2high@aol.com
Sent: Wednesday, November = 07, 2007 8:47 AM
To: = lml@lancaironline.net
Subject: [LML] Re: = Flaps/faired position

In a message dated 11/6/2007 = 8:19:05 P.M. Central Standard Time, sbej@verizon.net writes:

Did I read correctly when someone = said that the fairings molded into the 360 fuselage are preset at the reflex position? So basically when the flaps are fair with these molded = fairing at the fuselage then they are reflexed up the proper amount? I have a 1998 kit.

Bryan,

Yes.

Scott Krueger AKA Grayhawk
Lancair N92EX IO320 SB 89/96
Aurora, IL (KARR)

See what's new at AOL.com and Mak= e AOL Your Homepage.

------=_NextPart_000_0056_01C82127.00B9D900--