X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2007 09:46:15 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from [212.247.155.13] (HELO swip.net) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.12) with ESMTP id 2374663 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 08 Oct 2007 01:27:49 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=212.247.155.13; envelope-from=eu262648@tele2.it X-Cloudmark-Score: 0.000000 [] Received: from [83.211.226.20] (account eu262648@tele2.it) by mailbe05.swip.net (CommuniGate Pro WEBUSER 5.1.10) with HTTP id 73043960 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 08 Oct 2007 07:27:10 +0200 From: "John F. Herminghaus" Subject: Re: [LML] Does ANYONE have a positive report on WX-500 Stormscope in a Lancair? X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser v5.1.10 X-Original-Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2007 07:27:10 +0200 X-Original-Message-ID: Reply-To: catignano@tele2.it In-Reply-To: References: X-Priority: 3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html;charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

In my Lancair » Columbia » Cessna? 300 it works fine. Not a home built, but still a composite. Perhaps the skin mapping called for in the installation manual is more important than one thinks.

On Sun, 07 Oct 2007 22:41:39 -0400
"Fred Moreno" wrote:
> I think this was asked once before, but I do not recall a single reply.
>
>
>
> Here is the question: my WX-500 - stay in the box - or prepare for
> frustration - or can one do a successful installation?
>
>
>
>Fred Moreno
>