Mailing List lml@lancaironline.net Message #43778
From: Harry League <harryleague@comcast.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: RE: [LML] fallability in the digital age
Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 10:21:52 -0400
To: <lml@lancaironline.net>

Craig,

 

What AHRS did you have in the plane?

 

Regards,

Harry League

 

 


From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Craig Berland
Sent: Saturday, August 25, 2007 7:07 AM
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Subject: [LML] fallability in the digital age

 

I am in a motel room right now in Medford, OR.  Landed a few hours ago after retuning from a six day trip to Anchorage, Alaska and back in a Cessna 182 RG with two Chelton displays.  Obviously certified.  I am a relatively low time IFR pilot and not nearly as capable as many of you.  With that said, On this trip I flew approximately 15 hours IMC and shot 25 approaches all of which were IMC except two.  Several were to minimums.  To get a feel for this trip, check out the approach and miss into Valdez, Alaska.  It went to minimum however we made it in.  I can tell you point blank, the Chelton improved the safety of that approach 1000%.  I will also tell you I would not have left the ground on any leg without an autopilot.  All legs were flown from total IMC to some IMC.  The Chelton system is amazing. 

 

We did have some problems with the Chelton after one of our stops in heavy rain.  The PFD went tango uniform as Brent says.  We departed with one display and backups.  The PFD was fine when it was turned on in level flight.  Doing so did eliminate the flight plan.  Did I say I wouldn't leave the ground without an autopilot?  We also had an attitude problem on the MFD.  So in summary, backups are mandatory, but the Chelton was a key reason my trip was both very enjoyable and safe.  Oh, most of the IMC was at zero to -2 degC.  You can figure the rest out.  Actually it was not bad at all.

Craig Berland

Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster