X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 13:00:27 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from mx2.pshift.com ([216.57.116.7] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.11) with ESMTP id 2278557 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 22 Aug 2007 12:51:50 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=216.57.116.7; envelope-from=colyncase@earthlink.net Received: from ccaselt2 (unverified [216.57.118.64]) by mx2.pshift.com (Vircom SMTPRS 4.4.568.54) with SMTP id for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2007 12:51:11 -0400 Received-SPF: none (mx2.pshift.com: domain of colyncase@earthlink.net does not designate any permitted senders) X-Modus-BlackList: 216.57.118.64=OK;colyncase@earthlink.net=OK X-Modus-RBL: 216.57.118.64=Excluded X-Modus-Trusted: 216.57.118.64=NO X-Modus-Audit: FALSE;0;0;0 X-Original-Message-ID: <156801c7e4dc$ac75ae40$0302a8c0@nvidia.com> From: "Colyn Case on earthlink" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" References: Subject: Re: [LML] What engine would you buy? X-Original-Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 12:51:23 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_1565_01C7E4BB.253906A0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3138 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_1565_01C7E4BB.253906A0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable you'll find that time on the phone is a big impediment to getting done, = in general. If you want to avoid that, always go with the vendor that has the best = reputation for schedule and service. therefore, I would say Barrett on the engine. I don't know of anyone doing a side by side comparison of a Barrett = Engine to a PE engine and finding the PE engine is faster. I do know = of a Barrett powered lnc4 that does over 300 knots. In avionics - Aerotronics has the best rep. ------=_NextPart_000_1565_01C7E4BB.253906A0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
you'll find that time on the phone is a = big=20 impediment to getting done, in general.
If you want to avoid that, always go = with the=20 vendor that has the best reputation for schedule and = service.
 
therefore, I would say Barrett on the=20 engine.
 
I don't know of anyone doing a side by = side=20 comparison of a Barrett Engine to a PE engine and finding the PE engine = is=20 faster.   I do know of a Barrett powered lnc4 that does over = 300=20 knots.
 
In avionics - Aerotronics has the best=20 rep.
 
 
------=_NextPart_000_1565_01C7E4BB.253906A0--