X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 10:32:59 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from mtai02.charter.net ([209.225.8.182] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.11) with ESMTP id 2278110 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 22 Aug 2007 09:59:47 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.225.8.182; envelope-from=bobljude@charter.net Received: from aa02.charter.net ([10.20.200.154]) by mtai02.charter.net (InterMail vM.7.08.02.00 201-2186-121-20061213) with ESMTP id <20070822135901.EMUL20157.mtai02.charter.net@aa02.charter.net> for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2007 09:59:01 -0400 Received: from BobsHPPavillion ([24.217.101.10]) by aa02.charter.net with SMTP id <20070822135900.MGTA26124.aa02.charter.net@BobsHPPavillion> for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2007 09:59:00 -0400 X-Original-Message-ID: <005501c7e4c4$9621d0f0$6401a8c0@BobsHPPavillion> From: "Robert Jude" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" References: Subject: Shock Struts for 360 - Tim's Debongers X-Original-Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 08:58:58 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3138 X-Chzlrs: 0 >Surely Tim has some quality comments on the deflation issue. Tim's dealt >with TK-5 'deflation' apparently and it would be good for him to >chime in >here. So Tim, please address these concerns with your experiences. Is the >aircraft grounded if one of the TK-5's 'deflate'? If the >answer has as one >of its components "it depends", please elaborate. Has anyone ever experienced a TK-5 deflation?? I don't think so. Why worry about something that is very, very unlikely to happen? Bob Jude