Mailing List lml@lancaironline.net Message #43545
From: Douglas Brunner <douglasbrunner@earthlink.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Straight Shot article in SWA Spirit Magazine
Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2007 11:39:53 -0400
To: <lml@lancaironline.net>
Along the same lines, there is an interesting article in the Wall Street Journal on Monday 8/13 about how the airlines use of smaller planes has lead to increased congestion at a number of hubs, most notably LaGuardia.
 
Another way that the airlines have caused the problems that they now wish to blame on GA.
 
D. Brunner
 
P.S.  On a recent flight from Redmond to Baltimore (through Portland and San Francisco) we had to spend the night in Portland because of mechanical problems. We were also "ground stopped" on the re-route through Chicago because of weather in Baltimore.  Didn't see a single GA plane at O'Hare but there sure was a line of commercial carriers and GA didn't cause United's mechanical problems.
 
Can't wait to be flying my Legacy!
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2007 3:36 PM
Subject: [LML] Straight Shot article in SWA Spirit Magazine

Dear Mr. Kelly,
 
As SWA Frequent Traveler and a General Aviation aircraft owner/ pilot and a retired military aircrew I take great exception to SWA's recent editorial printed in SWA Spirit Magazine. http://spiritmag.com/2007_08/clickthis/08spolight.php
 
The editorial is filled with many misrepresentations. Please set the record straight.
 
Point #1: Airway congestion is a myth. The skies are not crowded. A few big airports that serve the major airlines are overcrowded with airline traffic. Hub congestion is a fact and is the airline industry's making.  Point to point navigation that frees aircraft from using ground based navigation aids and its attendant airways has been around for a long time. GPS has been around for over ten years. I file and fly GPS direct almost every flight I make and I know your crews often ask for "direct to destination" to cut flight times. General aviation got onboard with GPS long before the airlines did. Delays experienced by airlines are their own making. Hub and spoke operations constrict the NAS system into a few major bottlenecks like O'Hare, Atlanta and New York. These airports are generally avoided by general aviation users who prefer smaller closer relievers. You can only fit so many airplanes onto the same piece of concrete. Southwest knows that better than any other airline. New airport construction is sadly lacking in this country. All aviation users need to get onboard together and demand new airport construction-- and not just at a few major hubs.
 
Pont #2: The ATC system served all segments of aviation in 1970 as it does today.
 
Point #3: The general aviation body is adamantly opposed to user fees. User fees have all but killed GA in other parts of the world. User fees are an invitation by one body to tax another into extinction. Be careful what you wish for because when GA is dead,  Southwest and the other airlines will be training its own future pilots at a huge expense that they currently do not fund.
 
Point #4: The airline industry as a whole should not be making recommendations to Congress on how to fund the FAA until they as a whole  can put their own financial house in order. The taxpayer has been underwriting the industry for years-- most recently with PBGC pension fund bailouts, bankruptcy proceedings and 9/11 handouts. The industry as a whole is the most poorly managed industry in America. Southwest Airlines stands apart and above much of the problems generated by the poorly led airlines and I am dismayed your good company would join ranks with the rest.
 
Please set the record straight in Spirit magazine or I will take my business elsewhere.
 
Regards,
 
William J. "Jeff" Edwards
Chesterfield, Missouri




Get a sneak peek of the all-new AOL.com.
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster