Return-Path: Received: from spamgaaf.compuserve.com ([149.174.217.151]) by truman.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.1 release 219 ID# 0-52269U2500L250S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Mon, 10 Jan 2000 10:17:58 -0500 Received: (from mailgate@localhost) by spamgaaf.compuserve.com (8.9.3/8.9.3/SUN-1.7) id KAA01567 for lancair.list@olsusa.com; Mon, 10 Jan 2000 10:22:59 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2000 10:22:42 -0500 From: Lynda Frantz Subject: What if Sender: Lynda Frantz To: "INTERNET:lancair.list@olsusa.com" Message-ID: <200001101022_MC2-9407-1952@compuserve.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >Do you: 1. Turn around and go back to VFR weather? 2. Climb up to 29,000' ? 3. Enter IMC and try to find a layer without icing? I suggest imagining one additional problem thrown upon the existing mix of problems in making these continue and go no go decisions. Ask yourself what would happen if the master relay fails open, or the cabin pressure controller malfunctions, or the ............ At the flight levels, the heavy metal is the primary source for icing reports. Light to moderate icing to the big iron will be moderate to severe for the little guy. The other condition mentioned was that the freezing level goes all the way to the ground, a factor that makes entering icing conditions without antior deice equipment a no brainer. It is illegal and foolish to take off with ice adhearing to the aircraft wings, why would you want to land that way? Considering the limited capabilities of the aircraft, Option 1 is the only correct answer.Options 2 and 3 are adding more risks to a flight that was turning bad even before departure. You did the right thing assuming you turned back. I suspect that this question was put forward to foster some discussion about flying into known icing conditions without the proper equipment and that the answer was already known. My Lancair 360 (non-critical laminar flow airfoil) has never seen forcast icing conditions and I plan to keep it that way. When it flys in light rain, I've seen the IAS decrease by about 5-8 knots.Light icing, which is all I have experienced, seems to have less effect on the cruise IAS than rain. Contaminated wings are known to have a lower critical AOA and a higher stalling airspeed. Jim Frantz >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LML website: http://www.olsusa.com/Users/Mkaye/maillist.html Builders' Bookstore: http://www.buildersbooks.com/lancair Please send your photos and drawings to marvkaye@olsusa.com. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>