X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2007 18:56:23 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from rwcrmhc14.comcast.net ([216.148.227.154] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.11) with ESMTP id 2230218 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 03 Aug 2007 02:00:24 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=216.148.227.154; envelope-from=j.hafen@comcast.net Received: from hafenj1 (65-115-165-130.dia.static.qwest.net[65.115.165.130]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc14) with SMTP id <20070803055934m14001d0mme>; Fri, 3 Aug 2007 05:59:44 +0000 From: "John Hafen" X-Original-To: "'Lancair Mailing List'" Subject: RE: [LML] Re: What causes stall/spin -- Why do so many engines quit? X-Original-Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 23:59:11 -0600 X-Original-Message-ID: <000001c7d593$6ffb56c0$0115a8c0@engagethoughtware.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6626 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3138 I agree that if an engine quits, either a recip or turbine, you need to = be all over both the AOA AND airspeed to get the craft safely (hopefully) = to the ground, and survive. A guy needs to resist his normal tendencies of "level flight" since he is now without power and is flying a glider, = that doesn't "glide" like a glider. So the first thing he should do is push = the nose down (against his instincts) to maintain airspeed -- which is = hugely counterintuitive to those of us with powered flight time versus glider = time. But that is what you have to do if you lose power. You can either = approach the ground under control and with speed, or without speed and out of control. No argument there. If engines didn't quit, you wouldn't have to worry about "technique" = (the academic argument of maintaining proper airspeed versus proper AOA) in = an emergency power off descent. So my question is, why do so many engines quit? John Hafen IVP 413AJ 75%=20 -----Original Message----- From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of = Skip Slater Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2007 7:38 PM To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: [LML] Re: What causes stall/spin John, I'd take issue with your statement that AOA indicators are good only = if=20 landing on a carrier. If that were the case, I don't think it would be=20 displayed in the PFD and HUD of the 737's I fly at American. Granted, most of the time AOA is not something you even look at. = Most of us use airspeed, not AOA as our target when landing. When it becomes an = invaluable tool is in the case of a stall, encounter with wake = turbulence in the pattern or particularly in the case of an engine failure when it can = show you when your wing is producing the most lift and particularly if=20 you're defeating yourself by trying to extract more lift than your wing = can=20 provide. You're correct that many pilots react to a dropping nose in a stall = by=20 pulling back on the elevator. The AOA will tell you aurally and show = you on the indicator when you're pulling too much. Heed it's guidance and you=20 stand a far greater chance of recovering rather than making things = worst.=20 If you're facing a forced landing, AOA will indicate optimum L/D for any = weight, which gives you the best glide performance. I flew AOA in the Navy and I used it for much more than just carrier=20 landings. At American, we practice windshear, microburst and unusual=20 attitude recoveries in the simulator using AOA as our primary guidance = for=20 pitch inputs. I'm glad I have it in my ES and advocate it's use in any=20 experimental. Skip Slater N540ES=20 -- For archives and unsub = http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html