X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 06:06:47 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from elasmtp-curtail.atl.sa.earthlink.net ([209.86.89.64] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.10) with ESMTP id 2170175 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 10 Jul 2007 22:09:25 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.86.89.64; envelope-from=rtitsworth@mindspring.com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=mindspring.com; b=juZ3nfDwoZ03AnHkBvcVJ03kwFnWyp0A7kQMyxQrR7jJlDG8bpzbGywobYq6gRm2; h=Received:From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:X-Mailer:In-Reply-To:X-MimeOLE:Thread-Index:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP; Received: from [68.40.94.44] (helo=RDTVAIO) by elasmtp-curtail.atl.sa.earthlink.net with asmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1I8RdJ-0005Rf-SE for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 10 Jul 2007 22:08:50 -0400 From: "rtitsworth" X-Original-To: "'Lancair Mailing List'" Subject: RE: [LML] Therm-X deice X-Original-Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 22:08:37 -0400 X-Original-Message-ID: <004801c7c360$659e5320$6400a8c0@RDTVAIO> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0049_01C7C33E.DE8CB320" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3138 Thread-Index: AcfDCLBmgXQuMRMMRKWs8QY6UVZM8gAVzMnw X-ELNK-Trace: b17f11247b2ac8f0a79dc4b33984cbaa0a9da525759e2654a2c3c73a990a35ed95c5d24becac9720f2fd1faeb0efa699350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 68.40.94.44 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0049_01C7C33E.DE8CB320 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit My understanding was that the "potential short" was between the Therm-X connector (stud) and the conductive lighting mesh embedded in the Columbia wing skin (due to potentially inadequate insulating clearance). Thus, the issue only related to the installation on those planes. _____ From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Bill Wade Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2007 11:41 AM To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: [LML] Therm-X deice There was some discussion earlier about deice systems- I'm interested in the Therm-X system myself. I ran across an AD for the Columbia aircraft ( 2006-25-08 ) that mandates rendering the system inoperative effective 12/21/06. This is to prevent a short at the connector that can damage the wings and horizontal stabilizer. There was no mention of this that I could find on the Kelley website. Even though AD's don't apply to Experimentals, I expect the equipment supplied by RDDent is similar. -Bill Wade ------=_NextPart_000_0049_01C7C33E.DE8CB320 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

My understanding was that the = “potential short” was between the Therm-X connector (stud) and the conductive = lighting mesh embedded in the Columbia wing skin (due to potentially inadequate insulating clearance).  = Thus, the issue only related to the installation on those = planes.

 

From: = Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Bill Wade
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, = 2007 11:41 AM
To: = lml@lancaironline.net
Subject: [LML] Therm-X = deice

 

  There was some discussion earlier about deice systems- I'm interested in the Therm-X system myself. I ran across an AD = for the Columbia aircraft ( 2006-25-08 ) that mandates rendering the system inoperative effective 12/21/06. This is to prevent a short at the connector that can = damage the wings and horizontal stabilizer.

 

  There was no mention of this that I could find on the Kelley website. Even though AD's don't apply to = Experimentals, I expect the equipment supplied by RDDent is similar.  -Bill = Wade

 

 

------=_NextPart_000_0049_01C7C33E.DE8CB320--