X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 11:41:04 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from [70.62.14.124] (HELO server1.USTEK) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.10) with ESMTP id 2169146 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 10 Jul 2007 10:58:08 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=70.62.14.124; envelope-from=r.simon@ustek.com Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C7C303.066A1162" Subject: ADAHRS TSO X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 X-Original-Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 11:00:02 -0400 X-Original-Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: ADAHRS TSO Thread-Index: AcfCVJyJf382Dp5pQ+66Ki1zyMnExQAq+ONQAACIDWA= From: "Lancair" X-Original-Sender: "Robert Simon" X-Original-To: "LML" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C7C303.066A1162 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =20 ________________________________ From: Robert Simon On Behalf Of Lancair Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2007 10:56 AM To: brent@regandesigns.com Subject: RE: ADAHRS TSO Robert writes: << But the problem brought up a limitation to my panel - lack of ADHRS redundancy. I started shopping and found that a second Pinpoint might cost $17k whilst a new-and-improved Crossbow 425 is about $3k. >>=20 =20 Brent writes:=20 That is not how the system was designed to be configured. =20 =20 Brent, =20 Perhaps we are speaking of different configurations. I do not plan to have two dissimilar ADHRS feeding all three Cheltons at the same time. Rather I had planned to have the Pinpoint feed #1 and #3 and have the Crossbow feed #2. Since each screen would be set for it's respective data source there should be no conflict - or so I thought. (Yes? No?) =20 Another configuration would be to set all three Cheltons to read the Pinpoint as prime and the Crossbox as secondary, and have a selector switch to choose the source. Normally all three would use the Pinpoint, much as I have now. If the screen were to go blue then I would throw the switch and feed all three from the Crossbow. Any reason that this would not work?=20 =20 Robert M. Simon ES-P N301ES=20 =20 (BTW - every e-mail that I send to the address listed on your communications bounces back. Is brent@regandesigns.com still valid?)=20 =20 ------_=_NextPart_001_01C7C303.066A1162 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

From: Robert Simon On Behalf Of=20 Lancair
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2007 10:56 = AM
To:=20 brent@regandesigns.com
Subject: RE: ADAHRS = TSO

Robert = writes:
<< But=20 the problem brought up a limitation to my panel - lack of ADHRS = redundancy. I=20 started shopping and found that a second Pinpoint might cost $17k whilst = a=20 new-and-improved Crossbow 425 is about $3k. >>

Brent=20 writes:
That is not how the system was designed = to be=20 configured.

Brent,

Perhaps we are speaking of different = configurations. I do=20 not plan to have two dissimilar ADHRS feeding all three Cheltons at = the same=20 time. Rather I had planned to have the Pinpoint feed #1 and #3 and = have=20 the Crossbow feed #2. Since each screen would be set for = it's=20 respective data source there should be no conflict - or so I = thought. =20 (Yes? No?)

Another configuration would be to set all three = Cheltons=20 to read the Pinpoint as prime and the Crossbox as secondary, and have a = selector=20 switch to choose the source. Normally all three would use the = Pinpoint,=20 much as I have now. If the screen were to go blue then I would=20 throw the switch and feed all three from the Crossbow. Any = reason=20 that this would not work?

Robert M. Simon

ES-P N301ES

(BTW - every = e-mail that I=20 send to the address listed on your communications bounces back. Is = brent@regandesigns.com still=20 valid?)

------_=_NextPart_001_01C7C303.066A1162--