X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 11:39:48 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from webmail-outgoing.us4.outblaze.com ([205.158.62.67] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.10) with ESMTP id 2168281 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 10 Jul 2007 00:31:12 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.158.62.67; envelope-from=cfi@instructor.net Received: from unknown (unknown [192.168.9.180]) by webmail-outgoing.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix) with QMQP id 852EF180012B for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2007 04:26:38 +0000 (GMT) X-OB-Received: from unknown (205.158.62.37) by wfilter.us4.outblaze.com; 10 Jul 2007 03:58:19 -0000 Received: by ws1-2a.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id A8BE98398B; Tue, 10 Jul 2007 03:58:18 +0000 (GMT) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_----------=_1184039898180183" MIME-Version: 1.0 From: "Ron Galbraith" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" X-Original-Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 21:58:18 -0600 Subject: Re: [LML] Re: WAAS upgrade- Comant ? Received: from [208.68.49.252] by ws1-2a.us4.outblaze.com with http for cfi@instructor.net; Mon, 9 Jul 2007 21:58:18 -0600 X-Originating-Ip: 208.68.49.252 X-Originating-Server: ws1-2a.us4.outblaze.com In-Reply-To: References: X-Original-Message-Id: <20070710035818.A8BE98398B@ws1-2a.us4.outblaze.com> This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --_----------=_1184039898180183 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" The 2480-300 is the exact same size as the 2480-301. Is that what you are asking? The stand alone GPS antennas are the same size for 430/530 or 430W/530W. The only difference is if you upgrade the GPS stand alone antenna from 430/530 to the W model is the connector(W uses TNC, non W uses BNC) and you need to have high quality cable. It's my understanding that a Garmin authorized service center has to do the upgrade, or at the very least verify that the antenna installation meets the Garmin requirements.=20 Ron ----- Original Message ----- From: "Colyn Case on earthlink" To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: [LML] Re: WAAS upgrade- Comant ? Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2007 21:10:44 -0400 Ron, is the 2480-300 a lot bigger than the old garmin antenna? I'm wondering if I'm going to have trouble fitting the new ones on my antenna deck. Colyn --_----------=_1184039898180183 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" The 2480-300 is the exact same size as the 2480-301. Is that what you= are asking? The stand alone GPS antennas are the same size for = 430/530 or 430W/530W. The only difference is if you upgrade the GPS = stand alone antenna from 430/530 to the W model is the connector(W uses TNC= , non W uses BNC) and you need to have high quality cable. It's= my understanding that a Garmin authorized service center has to do the upg= rade, or at the very least verify that the antenna installation meets the G= armin requirements.

Ron

----- Original Message -----
From: "Colyn Case on earthlink"
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Subject: [LML] Re: WAAS upgrade- Comant ?
Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2007 21:10:44 -0400

Ron, &n= bsp; is the 2480-300 a lot bigger than=20 the old garmin antenna? I'm wondering if I'm going to have trou= ble=20 fitting the new ones on my antenna deck.

Colyn

--_----------=_1184039898180183--