X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2007 21:01:52 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from vms040pub.verizon.net ([206.46.252.40] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.10) with ESMTP id 2167307 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 09 Jul 2007 13:53:36 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=206.46.252.40; envelope-from=sbej@verizon.net Received: from VALUED3253602F ([71.109.169.202]) by vms040.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-6.01 (built Apr 3 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0JKX00508AZOMB59@vms040.mailsrvcs.net> for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 09 Jul 2007 12:52:36 -0500 (CDT) X-Original-Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2007 10:52:45 -0700 From: "sbej" Subject: Re: [LML] Builder's log X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" X-Original-Message-id: <00fd01c7c251$f6d9d900$6602a8c0@VALUED3253602F> MIME-version: 1.0 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3138 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138 Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00FA_01C7C217.4843AEA0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-priority: Normal References: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_00FA_01C7C217.4843AEA0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I started using a free online log. I find I dont keep it updated enough = though. Now I just go through each step in the manual and make a check = mark for completed and then sign off the bottom of each page with the = date of completion.=20 My friend had his lancair recently inspected and he said the inspector = didn't even look at his log records for more than just to verify he had = some form of them. He did say the guy looked at his pictures of the = project though. He said the inspector spent most of the time on flight controls. Bryan =20 ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Bill Wade=20 To: lml@lancaironline.net=20 Sent: Monday, July 09, 2007 10:39 AM Subject: [LML] Builder's log What methods have people used to log their projects? It looks as though Aerocraft no longer sells the Kitlog program. I = had been thinking I might buy a copy during Builder Assist but instead = it could be downloaded. It seems pretty straightforward- how has it = worked for those who've used it and are there alternative programs? Thanks very much- Bill Wade ------=_NextPart_000_00FA_01C7C217.4843AEA0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I started using a free online log. I = find I dont=20 keep it updated enough though.  Now I just go through each step in = the=20 manual and make a check mark for completed and then sign off the bottom = of each=20 page with the date of completion.
My friend had his lancair=20 recently inspected and he said the inspector didn't even = look at=20 his log records for more than just to verify he had some form of=20 them.  He did say the guy looked at his pictures of the=20 project though.
He said the inspector spent most = of the time=20 on flight controls.
 
Bryan
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Bill Wade =
Sent: Monday, July 09, 2007 = 10:39=20 AM
Subject: [LML] Builder's = log

  What methods have people used = to log their=20 projects?
   It looks as=20 though Aerocraft no longer sells the Kitlog program. I had been = thinking=20 I might buy a copy during Builder Assist but instead it = could be=20 downloaded. It seems pretty straightforward- how has it worked for = those=20 who've used it and are there alternative programs?
  Thanks very much-  Bill=20 Wade
------=_NextPart_000_00FA_01C7C217.4843AEA0--