X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com X-SpamCatcher-Score: 2 [X] Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 00:43:13 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from bay0-omc2-s40.bay0.hotmail.com ([65.54.246.176] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.8) with ESMTP id 2050779 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 17 May 2007 23:43:48 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=65.54.246.176; envelope-from=randystuart@hotmail.com Received: from hotmail.com ([65.55.139.23]) by bay0-omc2-s40.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2668); Thu, 17 May 2007 20:43:11 -0700 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Thu, 17 May 2007 20:43:11 -0700 X-Original-Message-ID: Received: from 68.183.63.186 by BAY134-DAV13.phx.gbl with DAV; Fri, 18 May 2007 03:43:08 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [68.183.63.186] X-Originating-Email: [randystuart@hotmail.com] X-Sender: randystuart@hotmail.com From: "Randy" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" References: Subject: Prop Differences X-Original-Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 20:43:10 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0038_01C798C3.FB3B7150" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3028 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 May 2007 03:43:11.0610 (UTC) FILETIME=[A84D45A0:01C798FE] X-Original-Return-Path: randystuart@hotmail.com This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0038_01C798C3.FB3B7150 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Does anyone have any experiance testing the Hartzell F7666 prop against = the F7068 prop on a Lancair LNC2 360. I get great preformance with my = F7666, 210 kts, but I have an opertunity to change to the F7068. I'm = wondering if it's worth the trouble and cost.=20 Thanks,=20 Randy Stuart LNC2 ------=_NextPart_000_0038_01C798C3.FB3B7150 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Does anyone have any experiance = testing=20 the Hartzell F7666 prop against the F7068 prop on a Lancair LNC2 360. I = get=20 great preformance with my F7666, 210 kts, but I have an opertunity to = change to=20 the F7068. I'm wondering if it's worth the trouble and cost. =

Thanks,

Randy Stuart

LNC2

------=_NextPart_000_0038_01C798C3.FB3B7150--