X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com X-SpamCatcher-Score: 2 [X] Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Wed, 09 May 2007 17:56:18 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imo-m26.mx.aol.com ([64.12.137.7] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.8) with ESMTP id 2034789 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 09 May 2007 17:26:49 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.12.137.7; envelope-from=Sky2high@aol.com Received: from Sky2high@aol.com by imo-m26.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38_r9.2.) id q.bec.e9e545a (29678) for ; Wed, 9 May 2007 17:26:02 -0400 (EDT) From: Sky2high@aol.com X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 17:26:02 EDT Subject: Re: [LML] Re: IO-550 fuel injection X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-----------------------------1178745962" X-Mailer: 9.0 Security Edition for Windows sub 5365 X-Spam-Flag: NO -------------------------------1178745962 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 5/9/2007 3:59:54 P.M. Central Daylight Time, marv@lancair.net writes: [The area of a 1/4" id tube is about 0.05in^2, so it would take 1155 inches of tubing to hold 57.75cf, which equates to about 96 feet/minute to move that much volume. Increasing the ID of the vent tube to 3/8" would reduce that velocity by more than 1/2 (its x-sectional area is about 0.11in^2. ] Marv, Verrrrry interrrrresting. Not. You calculated the 1/4" tubing speed at .95 Kts (1.1 mph or 2938 furlongs/fortnight). I don't see water flowing against gravity with that little of a push. I am sure some engineer can calculate those forces. What, me worry? I only pump 5 gallons per hour out of each wing. But then, it is at a faster rate for a shorter duration (about 1 gal/minute) so the water has time to drip back down in between pump usage. I have never detected water in the fuel - even after several hours in "light" rain at 170 KIAS. I have a mini NACA vent in the belly for the header, that is drawing 10 gallons per hour (water must be lifted 2 feet), and I use 1/4" tubing with bevel cut vents for the wings (vertical run is about 5 inches). Scott Krueger AKA Grayhawk Lancair N92EX IO320 SB 89/96 Aurora, IL (KARR) Darwinian culling phrase: Watch This! ************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com. -------------------------------1178745962 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
In a message dated 5/9/2007 3:59:54 P.M. Central Daylight Time,=20 marv@lancair.net writes:
<= FONT=20 style=3D"BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" face=3DArial color=3D#000000 size= =3D2>[The=20 area of a 1/4" id tube is about 0.05in^2, so it would take 1155 inches of=20 tubing to hold 57.75cf, which equates to about 96 feet/minute to move that= =20 much volume.   Increasing the ID of the vent tube to 3/8" would=20 reduce that velocity by more than 1/2 (its x-sectional area is about=20 0.11in^2.  <Marv> ]
Marv,
 
Verrrrry interrrrresting.  Not.
 
You calculated the 1/4" tubing speed at .95 Kts (1.1 mph or 2938=20 furlongs/fortnight).  I don't see water flowing against gravity with th= at=20 little of a push.  I am sure some engineer can calculate those forces.=20
 
What, me worry?
 
I only pump 5 gallons per hour out of each wing.  But then, i= t is=20 at a faster rate for a shorter duration (about 1 gal/minute) so the wat= er=20 has time to drip back down in between pump usage.  I have never=20 detected water in the fuel - even after several hours in "light" rain at 170= =20 KIAS.  I have a mini NACA vent in the belly for the header, t= hat=20 is drawing 10 gallons per hour (water must be lifted 2 feet), and=20 I use 1/4" tubing with bevel cut vents for the wings (vertical=20 run is about 5 inches).
 
 
 
Scott Krueger=20 AKA Grayhawk
Lancair N92EX IO320 SB 89/96
Aurora, IL=20 (KARR)

Darwinian culling phrase: Watch=20 This!




See what's fr= ee at AOL.com.=
-------------------------------1178745962--