X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com X-SpamCatcher-Score: 2 [X] Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:43:05 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from elasmtp-galgo.atl.sa.earthlink.net ([209.86.89.61] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.8) with ESMTP id 2010023 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:54:52 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.86.89.61; envelope-from=artbertolina@earthlink.net DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net; b=c0k2N7FWppgmXkj7ZvU0heSwFyY0XJgtOLzyJLsxep9BVqnJsqX7MjPuQtGXv+Es; h=Received:Message-ID:From:To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP; Received: from [206.55.133.78] (helo=LAPTOP2) by elasmtp-galgo.atl.sa.earthlink.net with asmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Hgjod-00083F-Qx for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:54:00 -0400 X-Original-Message-ID: <000a01c78751$ef765980$4e00000a@LAPTOP2> From: "Art Bertolina" X-Original-To: "Lancair list Lancair list" Subject: Cooling Drag X-Original-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 08:53:57 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0007_01C78717.426BD830" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3028 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 X-ELNK-Trace: 1c57f4aab304e4a6fc8cc707cfd6285a4d2b10475b5711208622b7668bd5b37a43b1cd835e544da3654b883c43b27917350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 206.55.133.78 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0007_01C78717.426BD830 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Walter Thanks for the reply, let me make sure I'm understanding what your telling me, if I can better direct the air below the cylinders = to reduce the turbulence in that air steam and=20 make a smoother( reduce the friction) exiting of the air. In reducing the inlet area is it better to make the reduction in close to the propeller hub or outboard form the hub, or top or bottom or does it make any difference. Art ------=_NextPart_000_0007_01C78717.426BD830 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Walter

Thanks for the reply, let me make sure = I'm=20 understanding

what your telling me, if I can better = direct the=20 air below the cylinders to reduce the turbulence in that air steam and=20

make a smoother( reduce the friction) = exiting of=20 the air.

In reducing the inlet area is it better = to make the=20 reduction

in close to the propeller hub or = outboard form the=20 hub, or top

or bottom or does it make any=20 difference.

Art

------=_NextPart_000_0007_01C78717.426BD830--