Regarding the
Nebraska 320, except for a possible control system malfunction, of
which there is so far no indication, engine failure is not the 'final
cause' of an aircraft 'spinning in'. It is loss of control caused by
the pilot pulling (inadvertantly, because without an AOA he can't see
he's causing a stall) the wing's AOA higher than its stall
AOA.
Terrence,
Do you know for sure this was a stall/spin? Do you know for a fact
this aircraft did not have an AOA? I get a little weary of you beating the
AOA drum every time an aircraft goes down and there is the faintest
possibility that a loss of control may have been involved. Now I'm not
criticizing the use of an AOA, nor your desire to save lives. But we've
all read your, well, almost a rant, many times and it does get tiresome.
After reading several of your posts on this subject I get the impression
that you think having an AOA on all aircraft would eliminate
stall/spin accidents. While it should certainly help I think you would
find that even with AOAs there will be stall/spin accidents. When a pilot
finds himself suddenly in an unexpected critical situation, like low and slow
with some sort of power loss problem and with very little time to react, there
is no guarantee that any device or instrument will prevent a stall/spin if he is
not able to overcome the initial shock and panic and fly the plane within its
limits. Pulling back on the stick when close to the ground and descending
rapidly, or trying to tighten that turn just a little more to make a clearing,
is a very powerful involuntary reaction. I believe it would be difficult,
within a matter of seconds, to override that reaction and respond in a purely
rational manner. (This is where training really helps.) Would an AOA
help? Most likely. Would it prevent most stall/spin
accidents? Probably not.
Please give it a rest. For the most part you're preaching to the
choir.
Tom Gourley
|