X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com
X-SpamCatcher-Score:  30 [X]
Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Received: from [68.202.132.19] (account marv@lancaironline.net)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WEBUSER 5.1.7)
  with HTTP id 1934822 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 21 Mar 2007 11:43:35 -0400
From: marv@lancair.net
Subject: Re: Lancair vs Eclipse
To: lml
X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser v5.1.7
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 11:43:35 -0400
Message-ID: <web-1934822@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <315649.70251.qm@web84115.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
References: <315649.70251.qm@web84115.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/html;charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

<div id="_htmlarea_default_style_" style="font:10pt arial,helvetica,sans-serif"> <br><br><br><br><br><br>Posted for Kenneth Wolf &lt;mainewolfs@verizon.net&gt;:<br><br> Come on guys. Brent's attack ad is unfair and in part wrong.  The Eclipse <br>will do 372K, not 275. It will carry 6, not 4 passengers. RVSM and 135 <br>capability are delivered with all aircraft at this time. The fact that the <br>type rating is center line thrust is a great compliment and speaks of great <br>single engine handliing with the Eclipse. Upset training and recurrent <br>training are good things, not issues to be scoffed at. Flight into known icing <br>is on the adjenda. Brent says he'll take his Lancair 4P. The 4P at my airport <br>has had 6 partial or complete engine failures so far! <br> <br> Ken Wolf<br> <br> BTW, my comment on the 4P takes the Lancair out of context and paints the <br>entire fleet badly and unfairly, just as did Brent's comments unfairly reflect <br>on the Eclipse.
<br>&nbsp;</div>