X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com X-SpamCatcher-Score: 30 [X] Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2007 10:10:44 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from mail12.syd.optusnet.com.au ([211.29.132.193] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.7) with ESMTPS id 1926961 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 17 Mar 2007 20:26:38 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=211.29.132.193; envelope-from=fredmoreno@optusnet.com.au Received: from fred (optussatellitebintb.22bjipb002.optus.net.au [59.154.24.148]) (authenticated sender fredmoreno) by mail12.syd.optusnet.com.au (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l2I0POTa013849 for ; Sun, 18 Mar 2007 11:25:33 +1100 From: "Fred Moreno" X-Original-To: "'Lancair Mailing List'" Subject: Lancair IV flap travel question X-Original-Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2007 09:25:21 +0900 X-Original-Message-ID: <007101c768f3$f3d172c0$c211140a@fred> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0072_01C7693F.63B91AC0" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6822 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 Importance: Normal Thread-Index: Acdo8+mwoFwcHQNkQCybJTwQdMnQAw== This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0072_01C7693F.63B91AC0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I recall some discussion that the hydraulic cylinder on the Lancair IV = had a bit too much travel for the balance of the flap linkage. I did a = search of the archives, but could not conjure up the right word combination. =20 =20 What is the current wisdom on this topic? Are mods required to shorten = the cylinder stroke? Disclosure: I have an OLD set of hardware, so this = may be a problem that has since been addressed by the factory, that is, if it = was a problem. =20 Fred Moreno ------=_NextPart_000_0072_01C7693F.63B91AC0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I recall some discussion that the hydraulic = cylinder on the Lancair IV had a bit too much travel for the balance of the flap linkage. I did a search of the archives, but could not = conjure up the right word combination.

What is the current wisdom on this = topic? Are mods required to shorten the cylinder stroke? Disclosure: I have = an OLD set of hardware, so this may be a problem that has since been addressed by the factory, that is, if it was a problem.

Fred Moreno

------=_NextPart_000_0072_01C7693F.63B91AC0--