Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 21:29:19 -0500
Message-ID: <redirect-1875209@logan.com>
Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=68.142.198.212; envelope-from=earleschroeder@yahoo.com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;
  h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding;
  b=sYpHANC9xPMT0JB45M5/2/XRaJjGbzwSlicBqRjWmWBb0xM3DBfLtagzRWd5zb9cCZKiDy4ufBXFRa+E79CdkY6PctM+SkbUhRzsDTpcbWsOoajcAXQbdVMnMvd4uR7X+JkXkEqj/ez9nqfDnzvyBwnW2EnaZckoBFlo191hZts=  ;
From: Earl Schroeder <earleschroeder@yahoo.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: aileron reflex on LNC2
References: <list-1875157@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <list-1875157@logan.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

This discussion is very interesting to me.  During the building process, 
I intended to make the crossover rod length between the sticks 
adjustable while in flight to test the possibility of 'reflex' 
benefits.  Intentions never happened.  Now I wonder if I should revisit 
that thought?? 
If you are interested in a discussion by my son Jeff [NASA type] about 
this issue click the 'Select Discussions' on the left pane of  
http://www.lancaironline.net/maillist.html.  This was during the Winter 
of 1999.  If you come to any conclusions, please post them back to the 
list.  Thanks, Earl [LNC2 235/320]


> >>>What does the group think about reflexing both ailerons up a degree 
> or so?<<<
>  
> >>>My ailerons are indeed rigged so that both are slightly above the 
> wingtip faired in position.
>  
> Interesting, as my ailerons are reflexed up in flight, and flush with 
> the wingtips on the ground.