X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com X-SpamCatcher-Score: 10 [X] Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 20:19:14 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from bay0-omc2-s20.bay0.hotmail.com ([65.54.246.156] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.7) with ESMTP id 1875150 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 28 Feb 2007 20:18:05 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=65.54.246.156; envelope-from=gary21sn@hotmail.com Received: from hotmail.com ([65.54.250.91]) by bay0-omc2-s20.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2668); Wed, 28 Feb 2007 17:17:18 -0800 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Wed, 28 Feb 2007 17:17:18 -0800 X-Original-Message-ID: Received: from 71.220.201.217 by BAY115-DAV19.phx.gbl with DAV; Thu, 01 Mar 2007 01:17:14 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [71.220.201.217] X-Originating-Email: [gary21sn@hotmail.com] X-Sender: gary21sn@hotmail.com From: "Gary Edwards" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" Subject: Re: aileron reflex on LNC2 X-Original-Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 17:17:16 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_022A_01C75B5C.4BA3E6E0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: MSN 9 X-MimeOLE: Produced By MSN MimeOLE V9.50.0034.2000 Seal-Send-Time: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 17:17:16 -0800 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Mar 2007 01:17:18.0711 (UTC) FILETIME=[5AF26070:01C75B9F] X-Original-Return-Path: gary21sn@hotmail.com This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_022A_01C75B5C.4BA3E6E0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable >>>What does the group think about reflexing both ailerons up a degree = or so?<<< >>>My ailerons are indeed rigged so that both are slightly above the = wingtip faired in position. The purpose was to provide a very slight air = load in order to reduce the dead band around the system lash and any = "flutter" induced by the no-load situation. My view in flight is very = quiet ailerons pretty much faired in under the slight load.<<< Interesting, as my ailerons are reflexed up in flight, and flush with = the wingtips on the ground. Gary Edwards LNC2 N21SN 235/320 ------=_NextPart_000_022A_01C75B5C.4BA3E6E0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

>>>What does the group think about reflexing both ailerons = up a=20 degree or so?<<<

>>>My ailerons are indeed rigged so that both are slightly = above=20 the wingtip faired in position. The purpose was to provide a very = slight=20 air load in order to reduce the dead band around the system lash and any = "flutter" induced by the no-load situation. My view in flight is = very=20 quiet ailerons pretty much faired in under the slight = load.<<<

Interesting, as my ailerons are reflexed up in flight, and flush = with the=20 wingtips on the ground.

Gary Edwards

LNC2 N21SN

235/320

------=_NextPart_000_022A_01C75B5C.4BA3E6E0--