In a message dated 2/18/2007 11:37:32 A.M. Central Standard Time,
brent@regandesigns.com writes:
I have this gun.
People have told me there may be bullets
loaded in it but I don't believe them because I have a
friend who knows guns and has told me there are no bullets in my gun and every
year or so I have a look in the chamber. It is dark in there but I don't see
any bullets.
I have a habit of pulling the
trigger while pointing at random objects and
people.
Others with identical habits and situations report loud
explosions and destroyed property when they do this.
My experience is
that nothing bad happens.
My conclusion is that my behavior is
safe.
I am sure the FAA, my insurance company and the plaintiffs
attorneys will agree.
Sincerely,
Nylaflow
Enthusiast
"A man has got to know the
limitations of his equipment."
If you are
considering refuting this logic to reinforce a rationalization you have made,
don't bother because:
1) If you can afford $100 hamburgers you can afford
$100 brake lines.
2) You are not going to convince anyone who has changed
there lines that it was a bad thing to do.
3) You don't want to be the guy
they point to after the off runway
excursion.
Brent,
Balderdash!
One of the reasons I don't use arguments by analogy is that they are often
not analogous to the discussion at all.
Some people have reported failures with Nylaflo. None appear to
have reported any analysis as to why it failed. Was it excessive heat
generated by severe braking? Was it a poor installation that kinked the
line? Was it improper installation of fittings? Was it abrasion from
vibration? All of the above? None of the above? Some of the above?
Etc.
What I did present was one successful installation and why I thought
it is still successful. I don't care to replace my Nylaflo lines at
this time. I didn't suggest that any other aircraft braking application
make use of Nylaflo. The choice is still left to the individual.
This I do know - the best, most expensive item in the world is not free
from failure. The FAA and the insurance companies do not guarantee that
certified aircraft are made with the most reliable components, built and
installed by error-free individuals resulting in no failures, ever. I
know, I flew Cessnas with Continental engines, both working together most
of the time. That is precisely the reason I thought I could do better
myself.
I know how to calculate and rank the relative risks that I take.
I'm not that bold and I'm still getting old. Believe me, Nylaflo is not
high enough on my broad and long risk list at this time to
warrant ripping it out and replacing it now. I do not exist in a risk free
environment and I will not cease all activity because of risk.
Now, if you are only referring to all the other idiots like me that
continue to rely on Nylaflo, that's OK.
Scott Krueger
AKA Grayhawk
Lancair N92EX IO320 SB 89/96
Aurora, IL (KARR)
A man
has got to know his limitations
So as not to suffer imitations.
To contemplate luck's run
I shall go stare at the sun
And 'see' my meditations.