X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com X-SpamCatcher-Score: 2 [X] Return-Path: Received: from [68.202.132.19] (account marv@lancaironline.net) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WEBUSER 5.1.5) with HTTP id 1807590 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 02 Feb 2007 19:24:47 -0500 From: "Marvin Kaye" Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Wing positive pressure To: lml X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser v5.1.5 Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2007 19:24:47 -0500 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <764242.8974.qm@web53704.mail.yahoo.com> References: <764242.8974.qm@web53704.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset="iso-8859-1";format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Posted for Kyrilian Dyer : From the point of view of the whole airplane, the details of what loads the top and bottom wing skins see is irrelevant. Keep in mind that Paul was responding to the original question, "Why does the inboard gear door get pulled open during flight?" In engineering terms, one considers a 'control volume' that depends on what problem you are trying to solve. For the aerodynamicist, the difference in pressure between the upper and lower surface of the top and bottom skins individually is irrelevant, and his/her control volume is simply the external surface over which the air flows. But in the case where we are trying to understand the loads that are being applied to the skin (including the gear doors), one has to break the wing into appropriate physical parts based on the details of the design. For a solid propeller, one could argue that the aerodynamic loads imparted push and pull on the surface, and thus try to squish and pull it apart. You would consider thin layers within the propeller and figure out how the forces on the exterior try to push together or pull these layers apart. On a solid propeller I'd think these forces would be minor and may not be considered, but they're still there. Regardless of the control volume you pick (the top surface, the volume between and the bottom surface, or the whole thing as one), the total net force will be the same. In other words, if you have three pieces encompassing the whole wing; if you change the air pressure of the internal cavity it will influence the forces that the skins see, but there will be no net change in lift that the wing produces. If you fill the wing with fuel that has mass, the weight will act on the top of the lower skin and will cause it (as well as the whole wing) to see a greater downward force, equivalent to the weight of the fuel. Overpressurizing the wing tanks during leak testing may split your wing as the skins see a lot of pressure from within, but the wing obviously won't lift off your work bench or become heavier (by much). The net force over the whole wing is virtually unchanged. Similarly, if you have air being blown into the wing and pressurizing it a bit, or if the external skin surface (or gear door) otherwise sees a pressure lower than inside the wing, you'll have a greater problem keeping the gear doors closed but you won't change the overall lift that the wing produces. Cheers, - Kyrilian H & J Johnson wrote: """ Or if your flying a a/c with a foam core wing? Interesting prespective.. what about propellers which are of solid construction [not hollow]? JjJ """