X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from [161.88.255.139] (account marv@lancaironline.net) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WEBUSER 5.1.5) with HTTP id 1804020 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 01 Feb 2007 09:21:38 -0500 From: "Marvin Kaye" Subject: Re: [LML] Re: FW: [LML] Re: Turbine crash - power lost on takeoff: blah blah paperwork To: lml X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser v5.1.5 Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2007 09:21:38 -0500 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <00af01c745cf$d341f350$0301a8c0@Home> References: <00af01c745cf$d341f350$0301a8c0@Home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset="iso-8859-1";format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Posted for "John Barrett" <2thman@cablespeed.com>: I have to agree with Bill's comments about training and about simulators. The fancy ones are great (I've only flown basic ones) but the necessary functions include the ability to introduce failed systems and to create problems for the pilot to deal with. I was fortunate to have Navy flight training and time in fighters in the 1960's; many of you have similar experiences or commercial training like Bill had. Those of us with this type of training may have an advantage but we are certainly not bulletproof. Many of the mishaps and tragedies in Lancairs have befallen commercial and ex military jet jocks as well as low time pilots, so I'm not so sure that the hours logged or the sims are the primary discriminator. Bottom line in my opinion: if there was a good simulator training program for the Lancair series that we could take advantage of, I believe we'd all be better off. My two cents. John Barrett