If your MR2 is like most autos it uses an
O2 sensor in the exhaust as part of a feedback loop to dynamically adjust
mixture (timed injector pulses) via the ECU (engine control unit/computer).
It also uses a mass airflow sensor up front as part of that automatic mixture control
process. Thus in the automotive case, fuel pressure is not really
critical (as long as it is in the appropriate range to cause atomization from
the nozzle), since the ECU controls mixture via electrical fuel injector pulse
timing (it also controls spark timing). The whole system is actually
quite sophisticated to enable maximizing, horsepower, durability, and economy, while
also minimizing emissions, and it could easily adjust for 26,000ft and/or M60F,
but it’s only practical due to spreading the development/testing cost
over large auto production volumes.
The down side is if anything goes wrong,
it can easily just stop. My new Chevy Suburban was dead on the side of
the road, when a $5 crank position sensor went south. Luckily, it’s
way too heavy to get off the ground in the first place {grin}.
Rick
From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net]
On Behalf Of VTAILJEFF@aol.com
Sent:
Wednesday, January 31, 2007 5:28 PM
To:
lml
Subject:
[LML] Re: Altitude Switch -- how's a
guy to know?
In a message dated 1/31/2007 3:46:02 PM
Central Standard Time, marv@lancaironline.net writes:
For
further comparison, the engine in my Toyota MR2 hasn't run
noticeabley rich or lean for the last 175,000 miles.
There has been no service of the fuel system for 17 years.
But has your Toyota operated at FL 260 or in minus 60
degrees F, lately? (that is why your Toyota
is not a good comparison)