X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2007 00:55:12 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from mx3.pshift.com ([216.57.116.8] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.5) with ESMTP id 1803231 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 31 Jan 2007 22:31:30 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=216.57.116.8; envelope-from=colyncase@earthlink.net Received: from ccaselt (unverified [216.57.118.212]) by mx3.pshift.com (Vircom SMTPRS 4.4.568.0) with SMTP id for ; Wed, 31 Jan 2007 22:30:41 -0500 Received-SPF: none (mx3.pshift.com: domain of colyncase@earthlink.net does not designate any permitted senders) X-Modus-BlackList: 216.57.118.212=OK;colyncase@earthlink.net=OK X-Modus-RBL: 216.57.118.212=Excluded X-Modus-Trusted: 216.57.118.212=NO X-Modus-Audit: FALSE;0;0;0 X-Original-Message-ID: <013701c745b1$5ce3cf30$f710020a@nvidia.com> From: "colyncase on earthlink" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" References: Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Altitude Switch -- how's a guy to know? X-Original-Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 19:30:46 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0134_01C7456E.4E61F470" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3028 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0134_01C7456E.4E61F470 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable My fuel flow drops as well. If you have lower fuel flow you should have = a rise in EGT? Bryan If you're running ROP, yes (why would anyone want to do that???? - = sorry. couldn't resist) because you are getting leaner which is closer = to peak EGT from the rich side. You are running 180dF rich of peak of = course, right? Colyn ------=_NextPart_000_0134_01C7456E.4E61F470 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

My fuel = flow drops=20 as well. If you have lower fuel flow you should have a rise in=20 EGT?

Bryan

If you're running ROP, yes (why would = anyone want=20 to do that???? - sorry. couldn't resist) because you are getting = leaner=20 which is closer to peak EGT from the rich side. You are = running=20 180dF rich of peak of course, right?

Colyn

------=_NextPart_000_0134_01C7456E.4E61F470--