X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com
X-SpamCatcher-Score:   2 [X]
Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Received: from [68.202.132.19] (account marv@lancaironline.net)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WEBUSER 5.1.5)
  with HTTP id 1801877 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 31 Jan 2007 11:17:54 -0500
From: "Marvin Kaye" <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Question: hydraulic fluid versus ATF
To: lml
X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser v5.1.5
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 11:17:54 -0500
Message-ID: <web-1801877@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <008101c74551$bbe4ccb0$6501a8c0@axs>
References: <list-1800741@logan.com>
 <008101c74551$bbe4ccb0$6501a8c0@axs>
X-Priority: 3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset="iso-8859-1";format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Posted for "terrence o'neill" <troneill@charter.net>:

  Brent,
  Thanks for that info and entertainment.  Wilco, as I complete N211AL.
  Terrence

"""
    I have said it before and say it again, " Nylaflow " should not be used as
brake hydraulic tubing. It lacks in mechanical strength, thermal performance
and chemical resistance. The time spent replacing it with proper hose and hard
line will likely be less then the time spent on the repair when it fails.
  
   To all you Nylaflow Flat Earth Hollywood Moon Landing Society members,
  repent now or regret later!
  
   Regards
   Brent Regan
"""