X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com
X-SpamCatcher-Score:  10 [X]
Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
To: lml
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 14:17:49 -0500
Message-ID: <redirect-1799816@logan.com>
X-Original-Return-Path: <brent@regandesigns.com>
Received: from wind.imbris.com ([216.18.130.7] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.5)
  with ESMTPS id 1799431 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 30 Jan 2007 11:26:29 -0500
Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=216.18.130.7; envelope-from=brent@regandesigns.com
Received: from [192.168.1.138] (cbl-238-80.conceptcable.com [207.170.238.80] (may be forged))
	(authenticated bits=0)
	by wind.imbris.com (8.12.11/8.12.11.S) with ESMTP id l0UGPW4X023107
	for <lml@lancaironline.net>; Tue, 30 Jan 2007 08:25:38 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from brent@regandesigns.com)
X-Original-Message-ID: <45BF717E.3080105@regandesigns.com>
X-Original-Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 08:25:34 -0800
From: Brent Regan <brent@regandesigns.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040804 Netscape/7.2 (ax)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List <lml@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: Question: hydraulic fluid versus ATF
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="------------030804000900080802090307"