X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com X-SpamCatcher-Score: 1 [X] Return-Path: Sender: To: lml Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 13:58:21 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imo-m27.mx.aol.com ([64.12.137.8] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.5) with ESMTP id 1795225 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 28 Jan 2007 11:37:09 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.12.137.8; envelope-from=Sky2high@aol.com Received: from Sky2high@aol.com by imo-m27.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38_r7.6.) id q.d32.602fbf4 (43931) for ; Sun, 28 Jan 2007 11:36:10 -0500 (EST) From: Sky2high@aol.com X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 11:36:08 EST Subject: Re: [LML] ba ba paperwork X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-----------------------------1170002168" X-Mailer: 9.0 Security Edition for Windows sub 5358 X-Spam-Flag: NO -------------------------------1170002168 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Language: en =20 In a message dated 1/28/2007 9:02:05 A.M. Central Standard Time, =20 reddog@bentonrea.com writes: I really don=E2=80=99t understand the lml people that care more about the=20 registration than WHY the turbine powered Lancair had an of field deploymen= t I think we=20 as a group need this info more than some registration paperwork . What I= =E2=80=99m=20 getting to is was it fuel again or something else . Stills put this out som= e=20 days ago and he is on the correct path Yes I do Mr stills =20 Do you mean this one? =20 _http://www.ntsb.gov/ntsb/brief.asp?ev_id=3D20060901X01280&key=3D1_=20 (http://www.ntsb.gov/ntsb/brief.asp?ev_id=3D20060901X01280&key=3D1)=20 =20 The registration can be important to help find information in the NTSB=20 database, even though it may take a year for them to complete the investiga= tion.. =20 Scott Krueger AKA Grayhawk Lancair N92EX IO320 SB 89/96 Aurora, IL (KARR) A man has got to know his limitations. -------------------------------1170002168 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Language: en
In a message dated 1/28/2007 9:02:05 A.M. Central Standard Time,=20 reddog@bentonrea.com writes:
<= FONT=20 style=3D"BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" face=3DArial color=3D#000000 size= =3D2>

I really don=E2=80=99t under= stand the lml=20 people that care more about the registration than WHY the turbine=20 powered Lancair had an of field deployment I think we as a group need this= =20 info more than some registration paperwork . What I=E2=80=99m getting to i= s was it=20 fuel again or something else . Stills put this out some days ago and he is= on=20 the correct path  Yes  I do Mr stills=20

Do you mean this one?
 
http://www.ntsb.gov/ntsb/brief.asp?ev_id=3D20060901X01280&key=3D1<= /A>
 
The registration can be important to help find information in= the=20 NTSB database, even though it may take a year for them to complete the=20 investigation..=20
 
Scott Krueger=20 AKA Grayhawk
Lancair N92EX IO320 SB 89/96
Aurora, IL (KARR)

A m= an=20 has got to know his limitations.
-------------------------------1170002168--