X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com X-SpamCatcher-Score: 1 [X] Return-Path: Sender: To: lml Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 10:07:06 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from mx3.pshift.com ([216.57.116.8] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.5) with ESMTP id 1784670 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 23 Jan 2007 07:51:07 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=216.57.116.8; envelope-from=colyncase@earthlink.net Received: from ccaselt (unverified [216.57.118.212]) by mx3.pshift.com (Vircom SMTPRS 4.35.480.11) with SMTP id for ; Tue, 23 Jan 2007 07:50:17 -0500 Received-SPF: none (mx3.pshift.com: domain of colyncase@earthlink.net does not designate any permitted senders) X-Modus-BlackList: 216.57.118.212=OK;colyncase@earthlink.net=OK X-Modus-RBL: 216.57.118.212=Excluded X-Modus-Trusted: 216.57.118.212=NO X-Original-Message-ID: <1c5f01c73eec$ede4fe80$0302a8c0@nvidia.com> From: "colyncase on earthlink" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" References: Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Nose strut inspections - all models X-Original-Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 04:49:32 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_1C5C_01C73EA9.DF617610" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3028 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_1C5C_01C73EA9.DF617610 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable yes and I appreciate that. enjoy reading your posts. found my vibration problem. Now I'm trying to figure out why I'm 25 = knots slower than the current fast-build product. Test pilot thinks my = leading edge results in non-laminar flow. ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Sky2high@aol.com=20 To: lml=20 Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2007 9:28 AM Subject: [LML] Re: Nose strut inspections - all models Colyn, Thanks. Most of the time I choose my words carefully so that some = will grasp the nuance for its ultimate aim - humor and its positive = effects on flight safety. Grayhawk In a message dated 1/17/2007 11:04:01 A.M. Central Standard Time, = colyncase@earthlink.net writes: Dan said, Which should show landings =3D takeoffs, regardless of the=20 methods used to reconnect to Mother Earth I think the original post used the verb "enjoyed" v.t. 955 landings. ------=_NextPart_000_1C5C_01C73EA9.DF617610 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
yes and I appreciate that.  enjoy reading your posts.
 
found my vibration problem.   Now I'm trying to figure = out why=20 I'm 25 knots slower than the current fast-build product.  Test = pilot thinks=20 my leading edge results in non-laminar flow.
 
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Sky2high@aol.com=20
To: lml
Sent: Wednesday, January 17, = 2007 9:28=20 AM
Subject: [LML] Re: Nose strut = inspections=20 - all models

Colyn,
 
Thanks.  Most of the time I choose my words carefully so = that some=20 will grasp the nuance for its ultimate aim - humor and its positive = effects on=20 flight safety.
 
Grayhawk
 
 
In a message dated 1/17/2007 11:04:01 A.M. Central Standard Time, = colyncase@earthlink.net=20 writes:
Dan said,
Which should show landings =3D = takeoffs,=20 regardless of the
methods used to reconnect to Mother=20 Earth
 
I think the original post used the = verb=20 "enjoyed" v.t. 955 landings.
 
------=_NextPart_000_1C5C_01C73EA9.DF617610--