X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com X-SpamCatcher-Score: 30 [X] Return-Path: Sender: To: lml Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 12:16:28 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from host174.ipowerweb.com ([66.235.199.141] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.4) with SMTP id 1765192 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 17 Jan 2007 12:10:38 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=66.235.199.141; envelope-from=steve@oasissolutions.com Received: (qmail 56364 invoked from network); 17 Jan 2007 17:09:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO admin) (24.4.179.219) by host174.ipowerweb.com with SMTP; 17 Jan 2007 17:09:49 -0000 From: "Steve Richard" X-Original-To: "'Lancair Mailing List'" References: Subject: RE: [LML] Re: Pinpoint X-Original-Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 09:09:41 -0800 X-Original-Message-ID: <003301c73a5a$46ebe1c0$6601a8c0@admin> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0034_01C73A17.38CD83C0" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 In-Reply-To: Thread-Index: Acc6WW5HCLBk8ltyRj+Opykz9WcDeQAAH83w This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0034_01C73A17.38CD83C0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Tested my upgraded 425 in all the flight maneuvers I'm willing to do and it is rock solid. Steve Richard N1422M _____ From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Tom Gourley Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2007 9:03 AM To: lml Subject: [LML] Re: Pinpoint "I can think of 6 former 425 users that now fly Pinpoints (there are probably several times that number, CFS would know) and all are very satisfied (I named several in previous posts). I am unaware of a single Pinpoint user who has switched to, or back to, a 425." So the performance "data" is basically anecdotal and any comparison of the two products is subjective. Tom Gourley ------=_NextPart_000_0034_01C73A17.38CD83C0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Tested my upgraded 425 in all the = flight maneuvers I’m willing to do and it is rock = solid.

Steve = Richard

N1422M

From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] = On Behalf Of Tom Gourley
Sent: Wednesday, January = 17, 2007 9:03 AM
To: lml
Subject: [LML] Re: = Pinpoint

"I can think of 6 = former 425 users that now fly Pinpoints (there are probably several times that = number, CFS would know) and all are very satisfied (I named several in previous posts). I am unaware of a single Pinpoint user who has switched = to, or back to, a 425."

So the = performance "data" is basically anecdotal and any comparison of the two products is = subjective.

Tom Gourley

------=_NextPart_000_0034_01C73A17.38CD83C0--