X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com X-SpamCatcher-Score: 10 [X] Return-Path: Sender: To: lml Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 14:15:19 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from wind.imbris.com ([216.18.130.7] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.4) with ESMTPS id 1746789 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 11:41:39 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=216.18.130.7; envelope-from=brent@regandesigns.com Received: from [192.168.1.138] (cbl-238-80.conceptcable.com [207.170.238.80] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by wind.imbris.com (8.12.11/8.12.11.S) with ESMTP id l09Gemr0033320 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 08:40:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from brent@regandesigns.com) X-Original-Message-ID: <45A3C58C.10001@regandesigns.com> X-Original-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 08:40:44 -0800 From: Brent Regan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040804 Netscape/7.2 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List Subject: Re: AHRS Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------090006020309040703040002" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------090006020309040703040002 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Rob Logan writes: <> Rob, it is reasonable to expect that low latency data from an internal source would give better performance than something passed from the outside. The 500 couldn't pass certification testing without the "Aiding" from the external sources. I assume that the 42x has the same limitation so the question remains, What happens when you lose GPS? Do you know? I am not "throwing stones" or "badmouthing" Xbow. We were not asked to look in the 42x situation so I only have anecdotal information. I am just asking a reasonable question. What happens to that when I do this? Regards Brent Regan --------------090006020309040703040002 Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Rob Logan writes:
<<many issues were found and fixed in these early days
and xbow had great turnaround once armed with
raw data to address the early ugly issues.
They were a joy to work with and the 425 is
much faster and responsive than the 500. path quickening
for the flight path marker can tightened and
its a joy to fly an overhead with the dot exactly
on the runway and smack it with high AOA. something
that could never be done with a massively dampened 500.

its reasonable to assume these known issues
were addressed.

>>

Rob, it is reasonable to expect that low latency data from an internal source would give better performance than something passed from the outside. The 500 couldn't pass certification testing without the "Aiding" from the external sources. I assume that the 42x has the same limitation so the question remains,

What happens when you lose GPS?

Do you know?

I am not "throwing stones" or "badmouthing" Xbow. We were not asked to look in the 42x situation so I only have anecdotal information. I am just asking a reasonable question. What happens to that when I do this?

Regards
Brent Regan

--------------090006020309040703040002--