X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com X-SpamCatcher-Score: 1 [X] Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2007 00:19:08 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from elasmtp-banded.atl.sa.earthlink.net ([209.86.89.70] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.4) with ESMTP id 1741474 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 07 Jan 2007 00:14:43 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.86.89.70; envelope-from=douglasbrunner@earthlink.net DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net; b=A8QKc0JFtlNhMyjJ+jvXjYdMDxOBpdFvGn+gzMO1D67tkS2e0cBsmr5ZAf9O/8+L; h=Received:Message-ID:From:To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP; Received: from [66.159.66.231] (helo=DFWK3391) by elasmtp-banded.atl.sa.earthlink.net with asmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1H3QLy-0005AV-Kx for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 07 Jan 2007 00:13:55 -0500 X-Original-Message-ID: <004e01c7321a$9f29e550$8001a8c0@DFWK3391> From: "Douglas Brunner" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" Subject: AHRS X-Original-Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 00:13:51 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_004B_01C731F0.B60C7410" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3028 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 X-ELNK-Trace: ad85a799c4f5de37c2eb1477c196d22294f5150ab1c16ac0ca5278c929a4b8ef15faf3306ef1acc68a25db48aefdad0f350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 66.159.66.231 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_004B_01C731F0.B60C7410 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Chelton is willing to sell their Pinpoint AHRS for $4,000 to D2 = customers Crossbow is willing to sell their NAV425EX-100 for $2,800 to D2 = customers What are peoples thoughts on the comparison between these two: a.. Have the problems that Crossbow had previously been fixed? b.. Is this an apples to apples comparison - i.e. do both include the = same elements or is there a need to buy additional components for one or = the other? c.. Is there a sense that one or the other is a superior product? D. Brunner ------=_NextPart_000_004B_01C731F0.B60C7410 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Chelton is willing to sell their = Pinpoint AHRS for=20 $4,000 to D2 customers

Crossbow is willing to sell their NAV425EX-100 for=20 $2,800 to D2 customers

What are peoples thoughts on the comparison between = these=20 two:

Have the problems that Crossbow had previously been=20 fixed?
Is this an apples to apples comparison - i.e. do both = include=20 the same elements or is there a need to buy additional components for = one or=20 the other?
Is there a sense that one or the other is a superior=20 product?

D. Brunner

------=_NextPart_000_004B_01C731F0.B60C7410--