X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2006 00:28:29 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from smtp106.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([68.142.198.205] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1c.4) with SMTP id 1430233 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 02 Oct 2006 15:59:10 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=68.142.198.205; envelope-from=elippse@sbcglobal.net Received: (qmail 11830 invoked from network); 2 Oct 2006 19:58:29 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=sbcglobal.net; h=Received:Message-ID:From:To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MIMEOLE; b=U7a18k3YBO63xT8zwGH+wz2kfFT3Q56TDK3fp7bVIRRzj86lb0WCv6CsfaNGbg5CGVEUn0zE4w8xcRT90XuEvCJ658NTo7D2yCyLDqzqlZHf4u2zEqT+2b8KMCRELiOR7ykcvWGKauC4pjRDN9wdD3r5Ar2S67MBWCSqGh2fna4= ; Received: from unknown (HELO Computerroom) (elippse@sbcglobal.net@75.15.119.245 with login) by smtp106.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com with SMTP; 2 Oct 2006 19:58:29 -0000 X-Original-Message-ID: <000901c6e65d$28a1d7c0$f5770f4b@Computerroom> From: "Paul Lipps" X-Original-To: "Flying Editorial" Subject: Oshkosh coverage X-Original-Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 12:58:34 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0006_01C6E622.78339200" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2869 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0006_01C6E622.78339200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable It's interesting that in your photo coverage of the large fly-in at = Oshkosh, once called the "EAA Fly-in" but now bearing the hokey name of = "Air Venture", the only plane shown bearing the nomenclature = "Experimental" was Cessna's NGP prototype! Usta' was that the EAA Fly-in = centered around experimental aircraft, as did the organization once = called the Experimental Aircraft Association, which now goes under the = acronym EAA. This is apparently to disassociate the organization, in the = mind of the non-flying public, with those horrid little home-made = airplanes that keep falling from the sky in droves. This EAA is a = professional organization, not something "experimental"! They've even = gone so far as divesting from their membership card the words = "Experimental Aircraft Association"; they're no longer there! Paul Lipps 818 Park Way Arroyo Grande, CA 93420 elippse@sbcglobal.net ------=_NextPart_000_0006_01C6E622.78339200 Content-Type: text/html; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
    It's interesting that in your = photo coverage of the large fly-in at Oshkosh, once called the "EAA = Fly-in"=20 but now bearing the hokey name of "Air Venture", the only plane = shown=20 bearing the nomenclature "Experimental" was Cessna's NGP prototype! = Usta' was=20 that the EAA Fly-in centered around experimental aircraft, as did the=20 organization once called the Experimental Aircraft Association, = which now=20 goes under the acronym EAA. This is apparently to disassociate the = organization,=20 in the mind of the non-flying public, with those horrid little = home-made=20 airplanes that keep falling from the sky in droves. This EAA is a=20 professional organization, not something "experimental"! They've even = gone so=20 far as divesting from their membership card the words "Experimental = Aircraft Association"; they're no longer there!
 
Paul Lipps
818 Park Way
Arroyo Grande, CA=20 93420
elippse@sbcglobal.net ------=_NextPart_000_0006_01C6E622.78339200--