Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
To: lml
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 19:01:46 -0400
Message-ID: <redirect-1405166@logan.com>
Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=70.62.14.124; envelope-from=rsimon@ustek.com
Subject: RE: [LML] Re: Backfires LOP
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
Thread-Topic: [LML] Re: Backfires LOP
Thread-Index: AcbYhDZN/GSy5G9+QfCtZfUThIThegAPlQpw
From: "Lancair" <lancair@USTEK.COM>

 -----Original Message-----
From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of
Walter Atkinson
Subject: [LML] Re: Backfires LOP
On Sep 14, 2006, at 8:40 AM, Marvin Kaye wrote:

Is it that he has encountered it more with lightweight props?
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Yes.  I can think of no correlation to the prop weight.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Could the lower inertia make the lack of proper firing more obvious?  So
perhaps it's not that it occurs more often with a low weight prop but
that it is more obvious when it does occur. As you said, things to
ponder. . .=20

Robert M. Simon
ES-P N301ES
=20