X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com
Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 01:01:18 -0400
Message-ID: <redirect-1403911@logan.com>
X-Original-Return-Path: <billhogarty@hughes.net>
Received: from [64.97.144.102] (HELO n120.sc0.cp.net)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1c.4)
  with ESMTP id 1403580 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 14 Sep 2006 19:46:49 -0400
Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.97.144.102; envelope-from=billhogarty@hughes.net
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (69.19.84.131) by n120.sc0.cp.net (7.2.069.1) (authenticated as billhogarty@hughes.net)
        id 4508ECF500048383; Thu, 14 Sep 2006 23:46:02 +0000
X-Original-Message-ID: <4509E9A8.8060905@hughes.net>
X-Original-Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 16:45:44 -0700
From: billhogarty <billhogarty@hughes.net>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (Windows/20060719)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List <lml@lancaironline.net>, 
 William Hogarty <whogarty@ofloan.com>
X-Original-CC:  bradhogarty@ofloan.com,  Haywardmachinery@aol.com
Subject: L-IV Pressurization
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

 Doing the last bit of sealing before testing the pressurization.

Does anyone have any thoughts or suggestions.  Anything they might have 
done different to save time, effort, etc???

As always, I appreciate the help.  Regards,

Bill Hogarty