X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 15:28:39 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from vms040pub.verizon.net ([206.46.252.40] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1c.3) with ESMTP id 1354400 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 29 Aug 2006 10:35:55 -0400 Received: from [192.168.111.2] ([70.19.74.145]) by vms040.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-4.02 (built Sep 9 2005)) with ESMTPA id <0J4R0044WKI5EGO8@vms040.mailsrvcs.net> for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 29 Aug 2006 09:34:54 -0500 (CDT) X-Original-Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 10:34:52 -0400 From: Kevin Kossi Subject: Re: [LML] Exiting a Legacy post crash In-reply-to: X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" X-Original-Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit References: John, That is exactly what I am planning. I am going to install a cam in- between the two front Canopy hinges, that will pull pins out of the two forward modified separable hinges. As for the Canopy sliding back and decapitating me, or just taking out my teeth, I plan to install a hinge on the rear of the canopy for it to pivot up and back on. Some kind of hook that you engage, or a hinge made of chain link with a pin you can put in before takeoff. I am working with a Parachute company to develop a parachute that you don't sit on, (I want comfort, and no excuses not to wear it) You will have the usual harness straps, but the Chute Pack will slide into a pocket behind the seat and down at a 45 deg angle. They said they made something similar for another plane. Kevin On Aug 29, 2006, at 1:02 AM, Halle, John wrote: > Kevin wrote: > > "My question is, on the Legacy one of my fears is a hard landing and > not being able to open the canopy; What are the thoughts on the > custom openable windows made for the Legacy? It seams to me that > structurally it is not a good idea, given the fact that the window is > no longer part of the structure." > > It's a worry of mine too and, after four years of flying, I still > don't > have an answer for it. I think if you stay upright there should > not be > a problem, and history, at least so far, seems to bear that out. It's > hard to imagine anything that would jam either the hinges or the latch > mechanism. The thing I worry about is if you flip and end up upside > down. In that case, I suspect you are stuck inside until someone cuts > you out. Having gone in and out of the back window a few times during > construction, I can attest to the fact that those of us who have > put on > a pound or two will find it a tight fit. Trying to get past the > openable windows would, I fear, require a physique different from mine > -- and that's assuming full functionality. I've thought of > carrying one > of those hammer thingys, a knife, a saw, pretty much everying. I > think > the best solution might be a battery powered dremmel but I have to > say I > don't carry one. > > Having spent last weekend getting my ICAS clearance to do rolls at > airshows, I have another thing to think about: Is it possible to put > "pullable" pins in the canopy hinge attachment so you could bail > out in > an emergency? We were talking about the rule that you have to have a > parachute if you are dual and doing acrobatics and I pointed out that > the highest and best use of a parachute in a conventionally built > Legacy > is as a seat back cushion. A set of hinge pins would fix that in the > event of, say, a fire. It would also give you two ways to get out > after > a crash, asumming you were upright. > > -- > For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/lml/