X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 11:17:41 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from mxsf03.cluster1.charter.net ([209.225.28.203] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1c.2) with ESMTP id 1315037 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 25 Jul 2006 09:01:11 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.225.28.203; envelope-from=troneill@charter.net Received: from mxip11a.cluster1.charter.net (mxip11a.cluster1.charter.net [209.225.28.141]) by mxsf03.cluster1.charter.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k6PD0LnP006828 for ; Tue, 25 Jul 2006 09:00:21 -0400 Received: from 68-184-229-22.dhcp.stls.mo.charter.com (HELO axs) ([68.184.229.22]) by mxip11a.cluster1.charter.net with SMTP; 25 Jul 2006 09:00:21 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: i="4.07,179,1151899200"; d="scan'208"; a="628457456:sNHT350665596" X-Original-Message-ID: <004701c6afea$4abd3600$6501a8c0@axs> From: "terrence o'neill" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" References: Subject: Re: [LML] Re: response to Terrence O'Neill's posting... X-Original-Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 08:00:22 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2905 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2869 Dear Hamid, That's a lot of colorful prose, and personal attacking, just to disagree with my opinions. Ate you a mecal certified psychoanalyst, or just an admirer of Karl Rove? Terrence ----- Original Message ----- From: "Hamid A. Wasti" To: "Lancair Mailing List" Sent: Monday, July 24, 2006 10:59 PM Subject: [LML] Re: response to Terrence O'Neill's posting... > terrence o'neill wrote: >> The intent was to say that the airlines are not much safer than GenAv in >> spite of the fact that they have all these extra benefits: compete FAA >> congtrol of movement, latest technology, maxim um training, excellent >> experience ... as compared to the week-end Airknocker pilot. > Terrence, > > I believe you have a fundamental disconnect with reality if you believe > that part 121 flying is not much safer than the part 91 flying. The > accident data shows the difference to be more than an order of magnitude. > > Let me change the topic here for a second. I have not had a chance to > look through the archives to review everything that you have written, but > I do not recall pegging you as blatantly out of touch with reality. > However, recently you have come across as a tin foil hat wearing, black > helicopter fearing, government microchip implanted in the butt kind of > militia man from around here in the back woods of Idaho. Your spelling > and grammar have gone to hell, not to mention the logical content of your > e-mails. The spelling and grammar are deteriorating with each e-mail as > is your grasp of reality. > Terrence this is a serious suggestion, not a rhetorical one: Go and get > yourself checked out medically. There are a number of medical conditions > where the first symptom is a change in cognitive state. Usually the > change happens at a much slower pace (months and years) for chronic > conditions and at a much faster pace (over a matter of minutes or hours) > for acute conditions, but what we are seeing from you is still > troublesome. Please do yourself and those that care about you a great > favor and go see a doctor. And please do all pilots a favor and ground > yourself till you get a medical clearance -- there is clearly something > going on that needs evaluation. > > Regards, > > Hamid > > > -- > For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/lml/ >