X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 22:07:18 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imo-d23.mx.aol.com ([205.188.139.137] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1c.2) with ESMTP id 1284328 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 19 Jul 2006 22:05:51 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.188.139.137; envelope-from=Sky2high@aol.com Received: from Sky2high@aol.com by imo-d23.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38_r7.5.) id q.498.68d0cf2 (14502) for ; Wed, 19 Jul 2006 22:05:01 -0400 (EDT) From: Sky2high@aol.com X-Original-Message-ID: <498.68d0cf2.31f03ecc@aol.com> X-Original-Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 22:05:00 EDT Subject: Re: [LML] Pilot or Poser: One Man's Quest to Build the Ugliest Lancair Ever... X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-----------------------------1153361100" X-Mailer: 9.0 Security Edition for Windows sub 5318 X-Spam-Flag: NO -------------------------------1153361100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Language: en =20 In a message dated 7/19/2006 8:01:49 P.M. Central Standard Time, =20 j.hafen@comcast.net writes: As a new guy on the list, it is interesting to observe various =E2=80=9Ccam= ps=E2=80=9D=20 within the mailing list. It=E2=80=99s at least three dimensional.=20 Two clear/simple camps seem to be a little at odds. Call them =E2=80=9Cfun= ction=E2=80=9D=20 versus =E2=80=9Cform.=E2=80=9D=20 It seems a guy can go to great lengths to burry antennas (VOR, GPS, Com,=20 TCAD, Transponder, ELT etc.) within the skin of a plane (so it is beautiful= and=20 fast) or do it the old fashion way =E2=80=93 screw them onto the outside of= the plane=20 in full view for all the world to see.=20 I=E2=80=99m interested in your opinions relative to internal versus externa= l=20 antennas. Do you give up clarity/range/dependability/accessibility burying= an=20 antenna inside the plane, or does it matter?=20 Please advise, should you feel so inclined.=20 Also, any great stock tips would be much appreciated. John, =20 Carbon cloth, put'm on the outside. Glass cloth, the inside works just fin= e. =20 Buy low, sell high. =20 Which Lancair are you building since there are so many variations? =20 Scott Krueger AKA Grayhawk Lancair N92EX IO320 SB 89/96 Aurora, IL (KARR) Abnegate Exigencies! -------------------------------1153361100 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Language: en
In a message dated 7/19/2006 8:01:49 P.M. Central Standard Time,=20 j.hafen@comcast.net writes:
<= FONT=20 style=3D"BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" face=3D"Times New Roman" color=3D#= 000000=20 size=3D3>

As a new guy on the list, it is interesting to o= bserve=20 various =E2=80=9Ccamps=E2=80=9D within the mailing list.  It=E2=80= =99s at least three=20 dimensional.

Two clear/simple camps seem to be a little at=20 odds.  Call them =E2=80=9Cfunction=E2=80=9D versus =E2=80=9Cform.=E2= =80=9D

It seems a guy can go to great lengths to burry=20 antennas (VOR, GPS, Com, TCAD, Transponder, ELT etc.) within the skin of a= =20 plane (so it is beautiful and fast) or do it the old fashion way =E2=80= =93 screw them=20 onto the outside of the plane in full view for all the world to=20 see.

I=E2=80=99m interested in your opinions relative= to internal=20 versus external antennas.  Do you give up=20 clarity/range/dependability/accessibility burying an antenna inside the pl= ane,=20 or does it matter?

Please advise, should you feel so=20 inclined.

Also, any great stock tips would be much=20 appreciated.

John,
 
Carbon cloth, put'm on the outside.  Glass cloth, the inside works= =20 just fine.
 
Buy low, sell high.
 
Which Lancair are you building since there are so many variations?=20
 
Scott Krueger=20 AKA Grayhawk
Lancair N92EX IO320 SB 89/96
Aurora, IL=20 (KARR)

Abnegate Exigencies!
-------------------------------1153361100--