Mailing List lml@lancaironline.net Message #36400
From: George Braly <gwbraly@gami.com>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: RE: [LML] Straight bore vs choke
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2006 18:03:09 -0400
To: <lml>

 

 

We have lots of  long duration turbo experience with choked cylinders that has given us good results.

 

Not sure there is a problem that needs to be addressed and I don’t know how not having the choke solves the problem that is not presented.

 

It is possible to wear out the choke rather rapidly by not having sufficient full power fuel flow.

 

Regards,  George

 


From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Tom Gourley
Sent: Monday, June 26, 2006 12:25 AM
To: Lancair Mailing List
Subject: [LML] Straight bore vs choke

 

I recently ran across the website for Chuck Ney Enterpreses (http://www.chuckneyent.com/) and read where he advocates straight bore cylinders instead of tapered, or choked, cylinders.  I'm assuming the engine manufacturers have good reasons for designing taper into their cylinders (variable temperature expansion characteristics over the length of the cylinder?) Mr. Ney, on the other hand, claims a vast amount of experience indicating better performance and longevity by boring the cylinders straight.  I know we have some very knowledgeable engine people on the LML so I'd like to get their take on straight vs choke.

 

Tom Gourley

Legacy builder

 

Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster