Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2006 19:14:33 -0400
Message-ID: <redirect-1138290@logan.com>
Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.49.254.21; envelope-from=walter@advancedpilot.com
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v624)
In-Reply-To: <list-1136925@logan.com>
References: <list-1136925@logan.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Walter Atkinson <walter@advancedpilot.com>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Another Lean of Peak question

Most of them can be made to work right.

Walter


On Jun 1, 2006, at 6:34 PM, Taylor, David wrote:

Walter:

Thanks for the response.

Do you have any opinion on how much of bear the IO-540-V4A5 used in the
Legacy is to balance?

David T.


-----Original Message-----
From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of
Walter Atkinson
Sent: 05-31-2006 Wed 20:45
To: Lancair Mailing List
Subject: [LML] Re: Another Lean of Peak question

David:

**I know the new and rebuilt 550's in Legacys run pretty well LOP --
even without GAMI injectors.

Do the rebuilt 540's do this also???  Or do you need GAMI injectors to
run them LOP?**

The 540s are not as well balanced without GAMIjectors as the 550G.  As a
matter of fact, some of them are a real bear to balance.


**Do 540's run just as efficiently LOP (ie same SFC) as 550's???**


The TIO-540 and TSIO-550 have very nearly the same CR.  They have very
nearly the same BSFC(min), so the answer is "yes, they're pretty close
in efficiency."

Walter


--
For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/lml/

--
For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/lml/