X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Tue, 02 May 2006 22:37:18 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from [65.54.250.77] (HELO hotmail.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.9) with ESMTP id 1088068 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 01 May 2006 22:10:30 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=65.54.250.77; envelope-from=gary21sn@hotmail.com Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Mon, 1 May 2006 19:09:46 -0700 X-Original-Message-ID: Received: from 63.224.201.253 by BAY115-DAV5.phx.gbl with DAV; Tue, 02 May 2006 02:09:42 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [63.224.201.253] X-Originating-Email: [gary21sn@hotmail.com] X-Sender: gary21sn@hotmail.com From: "Gary Edwards" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" Subject: Re: AOA X-Original-Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 19:09:39 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00EF_01C66D52.CB6493F0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: MSN 9 X-MimeOLE: Produced By MSN MimeOLE V9.20.0026.0800 Seal-Send-Time: Mon, 1 May 2006 19:09:39 -0700 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 May 2006 02:09:46.0778 (UTC) FILETIME=[7C2D07A0:01C66D8D] This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_00EF_01C66D52.CB6493F0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Andres, I can relate more to your AOA contribution than I can with John's = abrasive post. John explains his point of view with a hammer approach = (military style). Terrance also makes a readable case for an AOA. I have no military pilot experience (am envious), although I have = multiple hours in Hueys in Viet Nam. I would be considered a low time = pilot by military standards. I have flown my Lancair without the AOA, = then with the AOA. I like it. For me, I feel it helps me "one notch" = more than without it to be a better pilot. Hopefully, in the future, in = a pinch, it will give me a better advantage. I am a Technical Counselor for an EAA chapter. I speak of the "nothing = to lose by installing an AOA" with builders I am involved with. They = decide whether to install and use it. Gary Edwards LNC2 N21SN ------=_NextPart_000_00EF_01C66D52.CB6493F0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Andres,

I can relate more to your AOA contribution than I can with John's = abrasive=20 post. John explains his point of view with a hammer approach = (military=20 style). Terrance also makes a readable case for an AOA.

I have no military pilot experience (am envious), although I have = multiple=20 hours in Hueys in Viet Nam. I would be considered a low time = pilot by=20 military standards. I have flown my Lancair without the AOA, then = with the=20 AOA. I like it. For me, I feel it helps me "one notch" = more=20 than without it to be a better pilot. Hopefully, in the future, in = a=20 pinch, it will give me a better advantage.

I am a Technical Counselor for an EAA chapter. I speak = of the=20 "nothing to lose by installing an AOA" with builders I am involved=20 with. They decide whether to install and use it.

Gary Edwards

LNC2 N21SN

------=_NextPart_000_00EF_01C66D52.CB6493F0--