X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 19:52:09 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from mail05.syd.optusnet.com.au ([211.29.132.186] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.9) with ESMTPS id 1078670 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 24 Apr 2006 07:38:30 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=211.29.132.186; envelope-from=fredmoreno@optusnet.com.au Received: from fred ([59.154.24.146]) by mail05.syd.optusnet.com.au (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k3OBbKnx017498 for ; Mon, 24 Apr 2006 21:37:38 +1000 From: "Frederick Moreno" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mail" Subject: FW: CHT X-Original-Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 19:38:03 +0800 X-Original-Message-ID: <01fa01c66793$925a6950$c211140a@fred> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_01FB_01C667D6.A07DA950" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2869 Importance: Normal This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_01FB_01C667D6.A07DA950 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Paul: You have shown some very innovative work. Have you quantified the reduction in cooling drag from your configuration? Any before and after data? Have you flown side by side with an otherwise identical airplane and seen how much speed improvement you have gained? One good data point, with good calibrated instruments and good procedures is worth 100 simulations or 1000 arguments. More data, less religion and speculation! Fred Moreno -----Original Message----- From: Paul Lipps [mailto:elippse@sbcglobal.net] Sent: Monday, 24 April 2006 12:50 AM Subject: CHT From the recent postings about CHT, I can see that this discussion lies in the realm of religion, politics, and LOP vs ROP! There are disciples and there are disciples, each with a very reasoned tale, full of a lot of sense, about why you should follow this particular path to salvation, self realization, and glory. So pick which one resonates with your own heartfelt beliefs, ignore the others as the rantings of the deranged, and be happy! ------=_NextPart_000_01FB_01C667D6.A07DA950 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Paul:

You have shown some very = innovative work. Have you quantified the reduction in cooling drag from your = configuration?

Any before and after data? =

Have you flown side by side with = an otherwise identical airplane and seen how much speed improvement you have = gained?

One good data point, with good = calibrated instruments and good procedures is worth 100 simulations or 1000 = arguments.

More data, less religion and = speculation!

Fred Moreno

-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Lipps [mailto:elippse@sbcglobal.net]
Sent: Monday, 24 April 2006 12:50 AM
Subject: = CHT

From the recent postings about CHT, I can see that = this discussion lies in the realm of religion, politics, and LOP vs ROP! = There are disciples and there are disciples, each with a very reasoned tale, = full of a lot of sense, about why you should follow this particular path to salvation, self realization, and glory. So pick which one resonates with = your own heartfelt beliefs, ignore the others as the rantings of the deranged, and be happy!

------=_NextPart_000_01FB_01C667D6.A07DA950--