X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 19:48:56 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from mail18.syd.optusnet.com.au ([211.29.132.199] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.9) with ESMTPS id 1078661 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 24 Apr 2006 07:30:49 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=211.29.132.199; envelope-from=fredmoreno@optusnet.com.au Received: from fred ([59.154.24.146]) by mail18.syd.optusnet.com.au (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k3OBTNCN027165 for ; Mon, 24 Apr 2006 21:29:46 +1000 From: "Frederick Moreno" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mail" Subject: FW: [LML] Compression, boost, and detonation X-Original-Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 19:30:03 +0800 X-Original-Message-ID: <01eb01c66792$767d3100$c211140a@fred> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_01EC_01C667D5.84A07100" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2869 Importance: Normal This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_01EC_01C667D5.84A07100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Never operated LOP while I was in the airplane. Our goal was BEST POWER, around 150F rich of peak. Getting that much horsepower LOP would have meant even more boost, and we were boosting beyond the turbochargers optimum efficiency quite a ways as it was. Fred -----Original Message----- From: colyncase on earthlink [mailto:colyncase@earthlink.net] Sent: Monday, 24 April 2006 12:38 PM Subject: Re: [LML] Compression, boost, and detonation Fred, interesting post. Did you guys ever figure out how LOP you would have to be to keep under 400dF CHT? ....or more to the point, what your max LOP fuel flow (and therefore power) was to keep CHT below 400dF Colyn ------=_NextPart_000_01EC_01C667D5.84A07100 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Never operated LOP while I was in = the airplane. Our goal was BEST POWER, around 150F rich of peak. Getting = that much horsepower LOP would have meant even more boost, and we were boosting beyond the = turbochargers optimum efficiency quite a ways as it was.

Fred

-----Original Message-----
From: colyncase on = earthlink [mailto:colyncase@earthlink.net]
Sent: Monday, 24 April 2006 12:38 PM
Subject: Re: [LML] = Compression, boost, and detonation

Fred,

interesting = post.

Did you guys ever figure out how = LOP you would have to be to keep under 400dF CHT?

....or more to the point, what your max LOP fuel flow = (and therefore power) was to keep CHT below 400dF

Colyn

------=_NextPart_000_01EC_01C667D5.84A07100--